From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: robherring2@gmail.com (Rob Herring)
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2012 14:33:36 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 4/9] ARM: GIC: remove direct use of gic_raise_softirq
In-Reply-To: <50B3E10F.9070500@gmail.com>
References: <1353466713-18967-1-git-send-email-robherring2@gmail.com>
 <1353466713-18967-5-git-send-email-robherring2@gmail.com>
 <50B3E10F.9070500@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <50C10120.7030805@gmail.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 11/26/2012 03:37 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> Russell,
> 
> On 11/20/2012 08:58 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>> From: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
>>
>> In preparation of moving gic code to drivers/irqchip, remove the direct
>> platform dependencies on gic_raise_softirq. Move the setup of
>> smp_cross_call into the gic code. All platforms are using IPI#0 for
>> core wakeup, so create a common wakeup ipi function.
> 
> snip
> 
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/smp.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/smp.h
>> index 2e3be16..7933eb1 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/smp.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/smp.h
>> @@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ extern void cpu_die(void);
>>  
>>  extern void arch_send_call_function_single_ipi(int cpu);
>>  extern void arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask(const struct cpumask *mask);
>> +extern void arch_send_wakeup_ipi(int cpu);
> 
> I found there is already an arch_send_wakeup_ipi_mask() in your for-next
> tree, so I have rebased this to use it instead. Is your for-next branch
> stable for 3.8 and if not can you make commit b62655f4c6f3e4d21934e
> (ARM: 7571/1: SMP: add function arch_send_wakeup_ipi_mask()) available
> in a stable branch.

I'm still sitting on this series which ready to go. I need a stable base
and I can send to Russell or arm-soc.

Rob