From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: behanw@websterwood.com (Behan Webster)
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 09:47:17 -0500
Subject: vexpress compilation error in next-20121127
In-Reply-To: <1355478545.26914.2.camel@hornet>
References: <50B56601.5010305@broadcom.com> <50CA278D.4030409@websterwood.com>
 <1355478545.26914.2.camel@hornet>
Message-ID: <50CB3BF5.4000202@websterwood.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 12/14/12 04:49, Pawel Moll wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-12-13 at 19:07 +0000, Behan Webster wrote:
>> On 11/27/12 20:16, Markus Mayer wrote:
>>> Hi Pawel,
>>>
>>> There seems to be an issue compiling vexpress at this point. The
>>> problem being that vexpress' makefile references reset.o, but there's
>>> no reset.c in arch/arm/mach-vexpress.
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>    CC      arch/arm/mach-bcm/board_bcm.o
>>>    LD      arch/arm/mach-bcm/built-in.o
>>>    CC      arch/arm/mach-vexpress/v2m.o
>>> make[1]: *** No rule to make target `arch/arm/mach-vexpress/reset.o',
>>> needed by `arch/arm/mach-vexpress/built-in.o'.  Stop.
>>> make: *** [arch/arm/mach-vexpress] Error 2
>> Same issue in mainline now too: arch/arm/mach-vexpress/reset.c is missing.
> Yes, I've noticed this myself. It's just that the pull request for the
> arm-soc drivers branch went out in the second batch yesterday
> (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1409413), while the soc one
> in the first one.
I see it now. Thanks!

>   This was a bad decision to split the reset driver from
> the main update series, apologies about this.
No worries. Just making sure the issue didn't go unnoticed.

Thanks again,

Behan

-- 
Behan Webster
behanw at websterwood.com