From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: b-cousson@ti.com (Benoit Cousson) Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 09:13:06 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v4 16/23] ARM: OMAP2+: clock data: Merge utmi_px_gfclk into usb_host_hs_utmi_px_clk In-Reply-To: References: <1355134833-5199-1-git-send-email-rogerq@ti.com> <1355134833-5199-17-git-send-email-rogerq@ti.com> <20121214182855.GB4989@atomide.com> Message-ID: <50CED412.7060407@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, On 12/14/2012 07:44 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote: > Hi > > On Fri, 14 Dec 2012, Tony Lindgren wrote: > >> Paul, what about this patch? Looks like you've acked the other clock >> patches in this series but not this one? > > I commented on it briefly here: > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1838111/ > > Maybe Beno?t could comment here, but it looks to me (based on a > superficial look at the hardware clock tree data) that these clock nodes > should exist. In an ideal world, we'd be able to get back to the > autogeneration of this clock data. I'm not sure to understand either the rational for that patch. What the point of merging the two nodes? I mean, we can do it, but AFAIR, we have always decided to use atomic node instead of big nodes that handle everything. Regards, Benoit