From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sylvester.nawrocki@gmail.com (Sylwester Nawrocki) Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 00:14:38 +0100 Subject: [PATCH RESEND 6/6] clk: s5p-g2d: Fix incorrect usage of IS_ERR_OR_NULL In-Reply-To: References: <1355852048-23188-1-git-send-email-linux@prisktech.co.nz> <1355852048-23188-7-git-send-email-linux@prisktech.co.nz> <50D62BC9.9010706@mvista.com> <50E32C06.5020104@gmail.com> Message-ID: <50E4BF5E.9060108@gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 01/02/2013 06:10 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote: > clk_get() returns NULL if CONFIG_HAVE_CLK is disabled. It's not a problem for this driver, as it never dereferences what's returned from clk_get(). It would have to include , which it doesn't and which would have clearly indicated abuse of the clock API. Moreover, this driver now depends on architectures that select HAVE_CLK, so it couldn't be build when CONFIG_HAVE_CLK is disabled. > I told Tony about this but everyone has been gone with end of year > holidays so it hasn't been addressed. > > Tony, please fix it so people don't apply these patches until > clk_get() is updated to not return NULL. It sucks to have to revert > patches. As explained by Russell many times, the clock API users should not care whether the value returned from clk_get() is NULL or not. It should only be tested with IS_ERR(). The patches look fine to me, no need to do anything. --- Regards, Sylwester