From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: pgaikwad@nvidia.com (Prashant Gaikwad) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 08:23:32 +0530 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] clk: tegra30: Convert clk out to composite clk In-Reply-To: <50E7027A.1090102@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1357278706-28149-1-git-send-email-pgaikwad@nvidia.com> <1357278706-28149-2-git-send-email-pgaikwad@nvidia.com> <50E7027A.1090102@wwwdotorg.org> Message-ID: <50E795AC.5030106@nvidia.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Friday 04 January 2013 09:55 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 01/03/2013 10:51 PM, Prashant Gaikwad wrote: >> Convert clk out to composite clock type which removes >> the mux clock. >> >> Signed-off-by: Prashant Gaikwad >> --- >> This patch is rebased on ccf-rework for Tegra patch series. It is just to show >> how clk-composite can be used, not to be merged. If patch 1 is accepted then >> I would like to merge this patch to ccf-rework series. > Just so I'm clear, is the intent that patch 1 of this series gets > reviewed/accepted, and then you'll repost an updated version of the > Tegra CCF rework series that relies on patch 1? If so, patch 1 would > need to be either taken through the Tegra tree, or put into a separate > branch in the clock tree, so the Tegra tree can merge it as a dependency > of the Tegra CCF rework branch. Yes, that is my plan but you can tell whatever you are comfortable with. I will re-order the dependencies.