From: robherring2@gmail.com (Rob Herring)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: nommu: re-enable use of vexpress without ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 14:39:36 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50EDD588.3040603@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201301092022.49130.arnd@arndb.de>
On 01/09/2013 02:22 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 January 2013, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>> On Wed, 9 Jan 2013, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>
>>> On a related topic, I still think we should fix ARCH_MULTI_V7 not
>>> to select ARCH_VEXPRESS unconditionally and come up with a better
>>> way to avoid having an empty platform list to make 'allnoconfig'
>>> still work.
>>
>> The virtual guest platform support that Will and Marc did is small
>> enough that it could always be selected in place of vexpress.
>
> But that only helps when ARMv7 is selected, unless we want to build
> it only for ARMv4, v5 or v6 kernels.
>
> Besides, the only reason we can't have a kernel without any platform
> selected is that the linker script has code in it to intentionally
> barf on that because it's guaranteed not to boot on any hardware.
>
> If we decide that building an allnoconfig without any platform
> is actually ok, we could just as well rip out that error statement.
>
That patch is already posted, but Russell doesn't like it as you can
have a kernel that doesn't boot. You don't like the allno and randconfig
failures, so we're stuck. I think there are dozens of config options
that will make you not boot on any given platform, so failing to boot
because you did not select your machine is a non-issue.
Rob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-09 20:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-09 18:15 [PATCH] ARM: nommu: re-enable use of vexpress without ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM Jonathan Austin
2013-01-09 18:30 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-01-09 18:41 ` Will Deacon
2013-01-09 19:17 ` [PATCH v2] " Jonathan Austin
2013-01-09 18:43 ` [PATCH] " Arnd Bergmann
2013-01-09 18:54 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-01-09 20:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-01-09 20:39 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2013-01-09 20:48 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-01-10 3:51 ` Rob Herring
2013-01-10 10:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-01-10 13:20 ` Christopher Covington
2013-01-10 13:45 ` Marc Zyngier
2013-01-09 21:09 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-01-09 21:00 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-01-09 21:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-01-09 21:37 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-01-09 22:14 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50EDD588.3040603@gmail.com \
--to=robherring2@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).