From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: jon-hunter@ti.com (Jon Hunter)
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 07:59:09 -0600
Subject: [PATCH V2 2/2] ARM: dts: OMAP2+: Add PMU nodes
In-Reply-To: <50F01256.7030701@ti.com>
References: <1355766548-5702-1-git-send-email-jon-hunter@ti.com>
 <1355766548-5702-3-git-send-email-jon-hunter@ti.com>
 <50F01256.7030701@ti.com>
Message-ID: <50F01AAD.8020003@ti.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Hi Benoit,

On 01/11/2013 07:23 AM, Benoit Cousson wrote:
> Hi Jon,
> 
> On 12/17/2012 06:49 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> Add PMU nodes for OMAP2, OMAP3 and OMAP4460 devices.
>>
>> Please note that the node for OMAP4460 has been placed in a separate
>> header file for OMAP4460, because the node is not compatible with
>> OMAP4430. The node for OMAP4430 is not included because PMU is not
>> currently supported on OMAP4430 due to the absence of a cross-trigger
>> interface driver.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>
> 
> I've just applied this patch in my for_3.9/dts branch.
> 
> I'm wondering if there is any dependency with the previous patch? If
> Tony ack it I can take it as well.

I have been thinking about the best way to handle that. May be best for
you to take both if Tony can ack the first.

Cheers
Jon