[PATCH 2/2] ARM: tegra: add clocks properties to USB PHY nodes

[swarren@wwwdotorg.org (Stephen Warren)]

On 01/22/2013 11:43 PM, Venu Byravarasu wrote:
> Stephen Warren wrote at Wednesday, January 23, 2013 6:03 AM:
>> On 01/22/2013 05:28 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>> The patch to add USB PHY nodes to device tree was written before Tegra
>>> supported the clocks property in device tree. Now that it does, add the
>>> required clocks properties to these nodes.
>>>
>>> This will allow all clk_get_sys() calls in tegra_usb_phy.c to be replaced
>>> by clk_get(phy->dev, clock_name), as part of converting the PHY driver to
>>> a platform driver.
>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra20.dtsi
>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra20.dtsi
>>
>>> +		clocks = <&tegra_car 22>, <&tegra_car 127>;
>>> +		clock-names = "utmi", "pll_u";
>> ...
>>> +		clocks = <&tegra_car 94>, <&tegra_car 127>;
>>> +		clock-names = "ulpi", "pll_u";
>>
>> Hmmm. Thinking about that first clock more, if we name it just "phy" in
>> both the UTMI and ULPI PHY nodes, we could make tegra_phy_init() perform
>> the clk_get() for all PHY types, and use the same clock name everywhere,
>> and hence remove the type-specific clk_get()s from tegra_phy_init() and
>> utmip_pad_open().
>>
>> Venu, will this work for other chips such as Tegra30/Tegra114 and so on
>> into the future, or do chips after Tegra20 introduce any new clocks, and
>> hence break this scheme?
>  
> Should be fine, as same clocks are used across all chips.
> Acked-by: Venu Byravarasu <vbyravarasu@nvidia.com>

Thanks. I've applied both patches to Tegra's for-3.9/soc branch, with
patch 2/2 modified to name the first clock "phy" rather than "utmi" or
"ulpi".