From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: nsekhar@ti.com (Sekhar Nori)
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 21:03:14 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: davinci: da850: add interrupt-parent property in
 soc node
In-Reply-To: <1359112724-1217-1-git-send-email-prabhakar.lad@ti.com>
References: <1359112724-1217-1-git-send-email-prabhakar.lad@ti.com>
Message-ID: <51069A3A.8090404@ti.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 1/25/2013 4:48 PM, Prabhakar Lad wrote:
> From: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.lad@ti.com>
> 
> This patch adds 'interrupt-parent' property in soc node, so that
> the child inherits this property, this avoids adding 'interrupt-parent'
> to each node.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.lad@ti.com>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org
> Cc: davinci-linux-open-source at linux.davincidsp.com
> Cc: devicetree-discuss at lists.ozlabs.org
> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
> Cc: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
> ---

Looks good to me. Queuing for v3.9. BTW, we are moving the interrupt
parent property to soc node rather than adding it. So, I think a better
headline is "move interrupt-parent property to soc node". I change the
headline while committing.

Thanks,
Sekhar