From: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Santosh Shilimkar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 1/2] ARM: kernel: update cpuinfo to print CPU model name
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 11:22:50 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5108B532.6000706@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAB=otbR+MA3NUhxqRdo=w81gz9sTLAsLV5ELcpp77UxizMiaKw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wednesday 30 January 2013 04:42 AM, Ruslan Bilovol wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 05:54:24PM +0200, Ruslan Bilovol wrote:
>>> CPU implementer : 0x41
>>> CPU name : OMAP4470 ES1.0 HS
>>
>> Sigh. No. Look at what you're doing - look carefully at the above.
>>
>> "CPU implementer" - 0x41. That's A. For ARM Ltd. ARM Ltd implemented
>> this CPU. Did ARM Ltd really implement OMAP4470 ? I think TI would be
>> very upset if that were to be the case.
>
> Yes, it would be very surprisingly :)
>
>>
>> So no, OMAP4470 is _NOT_ a CPU. It is a SoC. The CPU inside the SoC is
>> a collection of ARM Ltd Cortex A9 _CPUs_.
>>
>> See? Please, learn what a CPU is as opposed to a SoC.
>
> Completely agree with you. I will fix this
>
Thank god you agreed to drop your current approach. Please elaborate
what you are going to fix and also state what user-space features
changes from OMAP4460 to OMAP4470.
Regards,
Santosh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-30 5:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-29 15:54 [RFC PATCH 0/2] ARM: update cpuinfo to print CPU model name Ruslan Bilovol
2013-01-29 15:54 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] ARM: kernel: " Ruslan Bilovol
2013-01-29 16:08 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-01-29 23:12 ` Ruslan Bilovol
2013-01-30 5:52 ` Santosh Shilimkar [this message]
2013-01-30 7:42 ` anish singh
2013-01-29 15:54 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] ARM: OMAP4: setup CPU model name during ID initialisation Ruslan Bilovol
2013-01-29 16:02 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] ARM: update cpuinfo to print CPU model name Nishanth Menon
2013-01-29 23:08 ` Ruslan Bilovol
2013-01-29 23:38 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-01-30 13:20 ` Ruslan Bilovol
2013-01-29 16:11 ` Rob Herring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5108B532.6000706@ti.com \
--to=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).