From: robherring2@gmail.com (Rob Herring)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] ARM: mach-shmobile: r8a7779: Allow initialisation of GIC by DT
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 08:15:37 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <510BCE09.7050302@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130201105849.GB21191@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
On 02/01/2013 04:58 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 12:34:10AM +0000, Simon Horman wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 09:11:19AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:32:13PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>>> Hi Simon,
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 01:50:49AM +0000, Simon Horman wrote:
>>>>> +
>>>>> + gic: interrupt-controller at f0001000 {
>>>>> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a9-gic";
>>>>> + #interrupt-cells = <3>;
>>>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>>>
>>>> Why is #address-cells needed here (and without #size-cells)? I see it's in the
>>>> binding document example, but I can't figure out why.
>>>
>>> Its here because I copied the example.
>>> I will see about removing it from here.
>
> Rob, Grant, do either of you know if there's a reason for this that we've
> missed?
>
> The gic doesn't have any direct children, and this doesn't seem to be
> some decvicetree interrupt-controller magic.
If you look at of_irq_map_raw, there are cases that look at
#address-cells. Those appear to be only when you have an interrupt-map
though.
>
> If this is superfluous, how about the patch below?
The docs probably should state #addr-cells is only required with
interrupt-map.
>
> I took a quick look at arch/arm/boot/dts/. Some gic nodes don't have
> #address-cells, some have it but not #size-cells, and some have both. These
> should probably be cleaned up too.
Some boards are using interrupt-map, so they may need #address-cells. So
I'm inclined to leave things alone.
Rob
>
> [...]
>
> Thanks,
> Mark.
>
> ---->8----
>
> From dc734edb8040513785429c11e40a420870dc55a4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 10:18:05 +0000
> Subject: [PATCH] Docs: gic: remove #address-cells from example
>
> The gic has no child nodes, and so doesn't need #address-cells. Having
> the property defined in the example only serves as a source of
> confusion.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt
> index 62eb8df..45b99ab 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt
> @@ -54,7 +54,6 @@ Example:
> intc: interrupt-controller at fff11000 {
> compatible = "arm,cortex-a9-gic";
> #interrupt-cells = <3>;
> - #address-cells = <1>;
> interrupt-controller;
> reg = <0xfff11000 0x1000>,
> <0xfff10100 0x100>;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-01 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-31 1:50 ARM: mach-shmobile: r8a7779, marzen: Reference DT implementation Simon Horman
2013-01-31 1:50 ` [PATCH 1/4] ARM: mach-shmobile: marzen: defconfig: use regulators by default Simon Horman
2013-01-31 1:50 ` [PATCH 2/4] ARM: mach-shmobile: r8a7779: Allow initialisation of GIC by DT Simon Horman
2013-01-31 12:32 ` Mark Rutland
2013-02-01 0:11 ` Simon Horman
2013-02-01 0:34 ` Simon Horman
2013-02-01 1:47 ` Simon Horman
2013-02-01 4:39 ` Simon Horman
2013-02-01 11:31 ` Mark Rutland
2013-02-01 10:58 ` Mark Rutland
2013-02-01 14:15 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2013-02-04 17:37 ` Mark Rutland
2013-01-31 1:50 ` [PATCH 3/4] ARM: mach-shmobile: r8a7779: Minimal setup using DT Simon Horman
2013-02-18 9:36 ` Magnus Damm
2013-02-18 11:37 ` Simon Horman
2013-02-18 12:14 ` Magnus Damm
2013-02-18 12:37 ` Simon Horman
2013-02-18 12:22 ` Magnus Damm
2013-02-18 12:37 ` Simon Horman
2013-01-31 1:50 ` [PATCH 4/4] ARM: mach-shmobile: marzen: Reference DT implementation Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=510BCE09.7050302@gmail.com \
--to=robherring2@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).