From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: nsekhar@ti.com (Sekhar Nori)
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 23:20:00 +0530
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/6] ARM: davinci: da850: add DT node for eth0.
In-Reply-To: <CA+V-a8uT-iF_TdWQwvnc1PfcQ9z3WBuZ2MYS1X_u3wO0_p=T0w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1359380879-26306-1-git-send-email-prabhakar.lad@ti.com>
 <1359380879-26306-5-git-send-email-prabhakar.lad@ti.com>
 <510E51FF.8090005@ti.com>
 <CA+V-a8uT-iF_TdWQwvnc1PfcQ9z3WBuZ2MYS1X_u3wO0_p=T0w@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <510FF4C8.7000706@ti.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 2/4/2013 10:37 AM, Prabhakar Lad wrote:
> Sekhar ,
> 
> On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> wrote:
>> On 1/28/2013 7:17 PM, Prabhakar Lad wrote:
>>> From: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.lad@ti.com>
>>>
>>> Add eth0 device tree node information and pinmux for mii to da850 by
>>> providing interrupt details and local mac address of eth0.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.lad@ti.com>
>>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
>>> Cc: linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org
>>> Cc: davinci-linux-open-source at linux.davincidsp.com
>>> Cc: netdev at vger.kernel.org
>>> Cc: devicetree-discuss at lists.ozlabs.org
>>> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
>>> Cc: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/da850-evm.dts |    5 +++++
>>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi    |   35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850-evm.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850-evm.dts
>>> index a319491..19aa2b3 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850-evm.dts
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850-evm.dts
>>> @@ -30,6 +30,11 @@
>>>               mdio: davinci_mdio at 1e24000 {
>>>                       status = "okay";
>>>               };
>>> +             eth0: emac at 1e20000 {
>>> +                     status = "okay";
>>> +                     pinctrl-names = "default";
>>> +                     pinctrl-0 = <&mii_pins>;
>>> +             };
>>>       };
>>>       nand_cs3 at 62000000 {
>>>               status = "okay";
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi
>>> index ba28f2d..76905f3 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi
>>> @@ -56,6 +56,26 @@
>>>                                       0x30 0x01100000  0x0ff00000
>>>                               >;
>>>                       };
>>> +                     mii_pins: pinmux_mii_pins {
>>> +                             pinctrl-single,bits = <
>>> +                                     /*
>>> +                                      * MII_TXEN, MII_TXCLK, MII_COL
>>> +                                      * MII_TXD_3, MII_TXD_2, MII_TXD_1
>>> +                                      * MII_TXD_0
>>> +                                      */
>>> +                                     0x8 0x88888880 0xfffffff0
>>> +                                     /*
>>> +                                      * MII_RXER, MII_CRS, MII_RXCLK
>>> +                                      * MII_RXDV, MII_RXD_3, MII_RXD_2
>>> +                                      * MII_RXD_1, MII_RXD_0
>>> +                                      */
>>> +                                     0xc 0x88888888 0xffffffff
>>> +                                     /* MDIO_CLK, MDIO_D */
>>
>> You call this mii_pins, but include mdio pins in there as well. Can you
>> separate them out? Then some board which uses rmii can simply reuse the
>> entry.
>>
> Ok makes sense.
> 
>>> +                                     0x10 0x00222288 0x00ffffff
>>> +                                     /* GPIO2_6 */
>>> +                                     0x18 0x00000080 0x000000f0
>>
>> This is SoC specific pin list. Such board specific pins should not make
>> it here.
>>
> Ok, so this should be set up using GPIO API's ?

Yes, the pins ultimately will be controlled by gpiolib APIs, but the
pins should be defined under the eth node in .dts

Thanks,
Sekhar