From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk (Ben Dooks) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 10:38:29 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: mm: mm->context.id fix for big-endian In-Reply-To: <20130210232949.GJ17833@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1360508248-25252-1-git-send-email-ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk> <1360508248-25252-3-git-send-email-ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk> <20130210232949.GJ17833@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <5118CA25.2020106@codethink.co.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 10/02/13 23:29, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 03:05:11PM +0000, Ben Dooks wrote: >> On 10/02/2013 14:57, Ben Dooks wrote: >>> Since the new ASID code in [b5466f8728527a05a493cc4abe9e6f034a1bbaab] >>> was changed to use 64bit operations it has broken the BE operation due >>> to an issue with the MM code accessing sub-fields of mm->context.id. >> >> Fixed the ref, new patch pushed to git. > > No you haven't. > > "Since the new ASID code in b5466f872 (ARM: mm: remove IPI broadcasting > on ASID rollover)..." > > is the correct way to refer to another patch by commit ID - both the ID > _and_ its summary line. You can use a short ID but it's a good idea to > add a few additional characters to avoid future hash clashes. My repo is showing: Since the new ASID code in b5466f8728527a05a493cc4abe9e6f034a1bbaab ("ARM: mm: remove IPI broadcasting on ASID rollover") was changed to use 64bit operations it has broken the BE operation due to an issue with the MM code accessing sub-fields of mm->context.id. Would you like the commit-id shortened? Is there anything else before this pair can be pulled? -- Ben Dooks http://www.codethink.co.uk/ Senior Engineer Codethink - Providing Genius