From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: r.sricharan@ti.com (R Sricharan)
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 19:22:22 +0530
Subject: [PATCH V6] ARM: LPAE: Fix mapping in alloc_init_section for
 unaligned addresses
In-Reply-To: <20130211131230.GA5676@MacBook-Pro.local>
References: <1360574009-12429-1-git-send-email-r.sricharan@ti.com>
 <20130211131230.GA5676@MacBook-Pro.local>
Message-ID: <5118F796.3080308@ti.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Hi Russell,

On Monday 11 February 2013 06:42 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 09:13:29AM +0000, R Sricharan wrote:
>> +static void __init alloc_init_pmd(pud_t *pud, unsigned long addr,
>> +				      unsigned long end, phys_addr_t phys,
>> +				      const struct mem_type *type)
>> +{
>> +	pmd_t *pmd = pmd_offset(pud, addr);
>> +	unsigned long next;
>> +
>> +	do {
>>   		/*
>> -		 * No need to loop; pte's aren't interested in the
>> -		 * individual L1 entries.
>> +		 * With LPAE, we must loop over to map
>> +		 * all the pmds for the given range.
>>   		 */
>> -		alloc_init_pte(pmd, addr, end, __phys_to_pfn(phys), type);
>> -	}
>> +		next = pmd_addr_end(addr, end);
>> +
>> +		/*
>> +		 * Try a section mapping - end, addr and phys must all be
>> +		 * aligned to a section boundary.
>> +		 */
>
> Should this read "next, addr and phys" instead of "end..."?
>
> Otherwise:
>
> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
>
  Can I put this in to patch system ?

Regards,
  Sricharan