From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk (Ben Dooks)
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 19:16:17 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 10/17] ARM: update atag-to-fdt code to be endian agnostic
In-Reply-To: <20130209120525.GD17833@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
References: <1360365467-25056-1-git-send-email-ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
 <1360365467-25056-11-git-send-email-ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
 <20130209120525.GD17833@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Message-ID: <51194381.9030505@codethink.co.uk>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 09/02/13 12:05, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 11:17:40PM +0000, Ben Dooks wrote:
>> -	if (atag->hdr.tag != ATAG_CORE ||
>> -	    (atag->hdr.size != tag_size(tag_core)&&
>> -	     atag->hdr.size != 2))
>> +	if (atag->hdr.tag != atag32_to_cpu(ATAG_CORE) ||
>> +	    (atag->hdr.size != atag32_to_cpu(tag_size(tag_core))&&
>> +	     atag->hdr.size != atag32_to_cpu(2)))
>
> This is wrong.  You're saying that "ATAG_CORE" is in LE32 format.  It
> isn't.  It's in CPU endian format.  If you want to do this kind of thing,
> you also need to define cpu_to_atag32() macros as well, otherwise this
> will cause sparse warnings.
>
>> -			initrd_start = atag->u.initrd.start;
>> -			initrd_size = atag->u.initrd.size;
>> +			initrd_start = atag32_to_cpu(atag->u.initrd.start);
>> +			initrd_size = atag32_to_cpu(____atag->u.initrd.size);
>
> Where did those four underscores come from?  Has this been built?

I probably missed building this one. I've been mostly testing with DT
based systems.

-- 
Ben Dooks				http://www.codethink.co.uk/
Senior Engineer				Codethink - Providing Genius