From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: loic.pallardy@st.com (Loic PALLARDY) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 21:36:39 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v2 00/13] drivers: mailbox: framework creation In-Reply-To: <37C860A02101E749A747FA2D3C1E3C50476638@DLEE12.ent.ti.com> References: <1360645032-9668-1-git-send-email-s-anna@ti.com> <20130213134207.GN17852@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <37C860A02101E749A747FA2D3C1E3C50476638@DLEE12.ent.ti.com> Message-ID: <511BF957.4010501@st.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Suman, I'll send new version of patch 11 taking into account Mark Rutland's comments. Regards, Loic On 02/13/2013 05:41 PM, Anna, Suman wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 02:36:32PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: >>> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 5:56 AM, Suman Anna wrote: >>> >>>> I have hosted the series at [3]. >>>> [3] >>>> https://github.com/sumananna/mailbox/commits/dbx500-prcmu-mailbox >>> >>> Suman, I suggest you ask Stepgen Rothwell to include this branch into >>> the linux-next tree, so we can get some rotation of this stuff in >>> preparation for the v3.10 merge window. (It's not going in now >>> anyway.) >> >> Best wait until after v3.9-rc1 - remember that linux-next is supposed to be a >> staging tree for the _next_ merge window only. > > Yes, will do. Anyway, we need a new revision of one patch (so far) to address Mark Rutland's comments. > > Thanks > Suman