linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: wni@nvidia.com (Wei Ni)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [lm-sensors] [RFC PATCH 2/9] hwmon: (lm90) split set&show temp as common codes
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:00:57 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51234D59.4060405@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130219033144.GA25610@roeck-us.net>

On 02/19/2013 11:31 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 07:30:24PM +0800, Wei Ni wrote:
>> Split set&show temp codes as common functions, so we can use it directly when
>> implement linux thermal framework.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Ni <wni@nvidia.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/hwmon/lm90.c |  117 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>>  1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c b/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c
>> index 863412a..caf01b0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c
>> @@ -702,29 +702,35 @@ static u16 temp_to_u16_adt7461(struct lm90_data *data, long val)
>>   * Sysfs stuff
>>   */
>>  
>> -static ssize_t show_temp8(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *devattr,
>> -			  char *buf)
>> +static void _show_temp8(struct device *dev, int index, int *temp)
> 
> Why do the new functions not simply return the value ? 
> Void return and returning the value in a pointer doesn't make much sense to me.

Yes, you are right, it's better to return value simply.
I will change it in my next version.

Wei.

> 
> Guenter
> 
>>  {
>> -	struct sensor_device_attribute *attr = to_sensor_dev_attr(devattr);
>>  	struct lm90_data *data = lm90_update_device(dev);
>> -	int temp;
>>  
>>  	if (data->kind == adt7461)
>> -		temp = temp_from_u8_adt7461(data, data->temp8[attr->index]);
>> +		*temp = temp_from_u8_adt7461(data, data->temp8[index]);
>>  	else if (data->kind == max6646)
>> -		temp = temp_from_u8(data->temp8[attr->index]);
>> +		*temp = temp_from_u8(data->temp8[index]);
>>  	else
>> -		temp = temp_from_s8(data->temp8[attr->index]);
>> +		*temp = temp_from_s8(data->temp8[index]);
>>  
>>  	/* +16 degrees offset for temp2 for the LM99 */
>> -	if (data->kind == lm99 && attr->index == 3)
>> -		temp += 16000;
>> +	if (data->kind == lm99 && index == 3)
>> +		*temp += 16000;
>> +
>> +}
>> +
>> +static ssize_t show_temp8(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *devattr,
>> +			  char *buf)
>> +{
>> +	struct sensor_device_attribute *attr = to_sensor_dev_attr(devattr);
>> +	int temp;
>> +
>> +	_show_temp8(dev, attr->index, &temp);
>>  
>>  	return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", temp);
>>  }
>>  
>> -static ssize_t set_temp8(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *devattr,
>> -			 const char *buf, size_t count)
>> +static void _set_temp8(struct device *dev, int index, long val)
>>  {
>>  	static const u8 reg[8] = {
>>  		LM90_REG_W_LOCAL_LOW,
>> @@ -737,60 +743,73 @@ static ssize_t set_temp8(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *devattr,
>>  		MAX6659_REG_W_REMOTE_EMERG,
>>  	};
>>  
>> -	struct sensor_device_attribute *attr = to_sensor_dev_attr(devattr);
>>  	struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
>>  	struct lm90_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>> -	int nr = attr->index;
>> -	long val;
>> -	int err;
>> -
>> -	err = kstrtol(buf, 10, &val);
>> -	if (err < 0)
>> -		return err;
>>  
>>  	/* +16 degrees offset for temp2 for the LM99 */
>> -	if (data->kind == lm99 && attr->index == 3)
>> +	if (data->kind == lm99 && index == 3)
>>  		val -= 16000;
>>  
>>  	mutex_lock(&data->update_lock);
>>  	if (data->kind == adt7461)
>> -		data->temp8[nr] = temp_to_u8_adt7461(data, val);
>> +		data->temp8[index] = temp_to_u8_adt7461(data, val);
>>  	else if (data->kind == max6646)
>> -		data->temp8[nr] = temp_to_u8(val);
>> +		data->temp8[index] = temp_to_u8(val);
>>  	else
>> -		data->temp8[nr] = temp_to_s8(val);
>> +		data->temp8[index] = temp_to_s8(val);
>>  
>> -	lm90_select_remote_channel(client, data, nr >= 6);
>> -	i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, reg[nr], data->temp8[nr]);
>> +	lm90_select_remote_channel(client, data, index >= 6);
>> +	i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, reg[index], data->temp8[index]);
>>  	lm90_select_remote_channel(client, data, 0);
>>  
>>  	mutex_unlock(&data->update_lock);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static ssize_t set_temp8(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *devattr,
>> +			 const char *buf, size_t count)
>> +{
>> +	struct sensor_device_attribute *attr = to_sensor_dev_attr(devattr);
>> +	int index = attr->index;
>> +	long val;
>> +	int err;
>> +
>> +	err = kstrtol(buf, 10, &val);
>> +	if (err < 0)
>> +		return err;
>> +
>> +	_set_temp8(dev, index, val);
>> +
>>  	return count;
>>  }
>>  
>> -static ssize_t show_temp11(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *devattr,
>> -			   char *buf)
>> +static void _show_temp11(struct device *dev, int index, int *temp)
>>  {
>> -	struct sensor_device_attribute_2 *attr = to_sensor_dev_attr_2(devattr);
>>  	struct lm90_data *data = lm90_update_device(dev);
>> -	int temp;
>>  
>>  	if (data->kind == adt7461)
>> -		temp = temp_from_u16_adt7461(data, data->temp11[attr->index]);
>> +		*temp = temp_from_u16_adt7461(data, data->temp11[index]);
>>  	else if (data->kind == max6646)
>> -		temp = temp_from_u16(data->temp11[attr->index]);
>> +		*temp = temp_from_u16(data->temp11[index]);
>>  	else
>> -		temp = temp_from_s16(data->temp11[attr->index]);
>> +		*temp = temp_from_s16(data->temp11[index]);
>>  
>>  	/* +16 degrees offset for temp2 for the LM99 */
>> -	if (data->kind == lm99 &&  attr->index <= 2)
>> -		temp += 16000;
>> +	if (data->kind == lm99 &&  index <= 2)
>> +		*temp += 16000;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static ssize_t show_temp11(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *devattr,
>> +			   char *buf)
>> +{
>> +	struct sensor_device_attribute_2 *attr = to_sensor_dev_attr_2(devattr);
>> +	int temp;
>> +
>> +	_show_temp11(dev, attr->index, &temp);
>>  
>>  	return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", temp);
>>  }
>>  
>> -static ssize_t set_temp11(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *devattr,
>> -			  const char *buf, size_t count)
>> +static void _set_temp11(struct device *dev, int nr, int index, long val)
>>  {
>>  	struct {
>>  		u8 high;
>> @@ -804,17 +823,8 @@ static ssize_t set_temp11(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *devattr,
>>  		{ LM90_REG_W_REMOTE_HIGHH, LM90_REG_W_REMOTE_HIGHL, 1 }
>>  	};
>>  
>> -	struct sensor_device_attribute_2 *attr = to_sensor_dev_attr_2(devattr);
>>  	struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
>>  	struct lm90_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>> -	int nr = attr->nr;
>> -	int index = attr->index;
>> -	long val;
>> -	int err;
>> -
>> -	err = kstrtol(buf, 10, &val);
>> -	if (err < 0)
>> -		return err;
>>  
>>  	/* +16 degrees offset for temp2 for the LM99 */
>>  	if (data->kind == lm99 && index <= 2)
>> @@ -839,6 +849,23 @@ static ssize_t set_temp11(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *devattr,
>>  	lm90_select_remote_channel(client, data, 0);
>>  
>>  	mutex_unlock(&data->update_lock);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static ssize_t set_temp11(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *devattr,
>> +			  const char *buf, size_t count)
>> +{
>> +	struct sensor_device_attribute_2 *attr = to_sensor_dev_attr_2(devattr);
>> +	int nr = attr->nr;
>> +	int index = attr->index;
>> +	long val;
>> +	int err;
>> +
>> +	err = kstrtol(buf, 10, &val);
>> +	if (err < 0)
>> +		return err;
>> +
>> +	_set_temp11(dev, nr, index, val);
>> +
>>  	return count;
>>  }
>>  
>> -- 
>> 1.7.9.5
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> lm-sensors mailing list
>> lm-sensors at lm-sensors.org
>> http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
>>

  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-19 10:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-18 11:30 [RFC PATCH 0/9] Support for tegra30 thermal Wei Ni
2013-02-18 11:30 ` [RFC PATCH 1/9] ARM: dt: t30 cardhu: add dt entry for lm90 Wei Ni
2013-02-19  3:28   ` Alex Courbot
2013-02-19  9:52     ` Wei Ni
2013-02-19 22:48     ` Stephen Warren
2013-02-18 11:30 ` [RFC PATCH 2/9] hwmon: (lm90) split set&show temp as common codes Wei Ni
2013-02-18 22:29   ` Matthew Longnecker
2013-02-19  9:48     ` Wei Ni
2013-02-19  3:31   ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
2013-02-19 10:00     ` Wei Ni [this message]
2013-02-19 22:56   ` Stephen Warren
2013-02-20 12:31     ` Wei Ni
2013-02-18 11:30 ` [RFC PATCH 3/9] hwmon: (lm90) add support to handle irq Wei Ni
2013-02-19  3:34   ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
2013-02-19 10:43     ` Wei Ni
2013-02-19 23:00   ` Stephen Warren
2013-02-20  3:27     ` Alex Courbot
2013-02-20 10:27       ` Wei Ni
2013-02-18 11:30 ` [RFC PATCH 4/9] hwmon: (lm90) use macros for the indexes of temp8 and temp11 Wei Ni
2013-02-19  5:39   ` Alex Courbot
2013-02-19  9:58     ` Wei Ni
2013-02-19 23:02   ` Stephen Warren
2013-02-20 10:29     ` Wei Ni
2013-02-18 11:30 ` [RFC PATCH 5/9] Thermal: Support using dt node to get sensor Wei Ni
2013-02-19 23:12   ` Stephen Warren
2013-02-20 10:36     ` Wei Ni
2013-02-18 11:30 ` [RFC PATCH 6/9] hwmon: (lm90) Register to the thermal framework Wei Ni
2013-02-19  3:42   ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
2013-02-19 10:47     ` Wei Ni
2013-02-19  5:22   ` Alex Courbot
2013-02-19 10:58     ` Wei Ni
2013-02-19 23:18   ` Stephen Warren
2013-02-20 10:40     ` Wei Ni
2013-02-18 11:30 ` [RFC PATCH 7/9] thermal: tegra30: add tegra30 thermal driver Wei Ni
2013-02-19 23:48   ` Stephen Warren
2013-02-20 12:23     ` Wei Ni
2013-02-19 23:56   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-20 12:29     ` Wei Ni
2013-02-18 11:30 ` [RFC PATCH 8/9] ARM: dt: t30 cardhu: add dt entry for " Wei Ni
2013-02-19  3:42   ` Alex Courbot
2013-02-19  9:56     ` Wei Ni
2013-02-19 23:28   ` Stephen Warren
2013-02-20 11:53     ` Wei Ni
2013-02-20 17:18       ` Stephen Warren
2013-02-18 11:30 ` [RFC PATCH 9/9] ARM: tegra: defconfig: enable thermal framework Wei Ni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51234D59.4060405@nvidia.com \
    --to=wni@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).