From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: wni@nvidia.com (Wei Ni) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 20:31:37 +0800 Subject: [RFC PATCH 2/9] hwmon: (lm90) split set&show temp as common codes In-Reply-To: <51240331.7080604@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1361187031-3679-1-git-send-email-wni@nvidia.com> <1361187031-3679-3-git-send-email-wni@nvidia.com> <51240331.7080604@wwwdotorg.org> Message-ID: <5124C229.4030002@nvidia.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 02/20/2013 06:56 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 02/18/2013 04:30 AM, Wei Ni wrote: >> Split set&show temp codes as common functions, so we can use it directly when >> implement linux thermal framework. > >> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c b/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c > >> -static ssize_t show_temp8(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *devattr, >> - char *buf) >> +static void _show_temp8(struct device *dev, int index, int *temp) > > This function now seems to be "get" not "show". If you rename it to e.g. > "get_temp8", then you won't need to use an _ in the function name. If > that name causes conflicts with later patches, perhaps "read_temp8". Yes, it looks "read_" is better. I will change it. > >> -static ssize_t set_temp8(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *devattr, >> - const char *buf, size_t count) >> +static void _set_temp8(struct device *dev, int index, long val) > > Similarly, perhaps "write_temp8"? > > Similar comments for the rest of the patch. >