From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0883C43387 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 12:27:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF78E214DA for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 12:27:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="uEZqtL/b" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org AF78E214DA Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sntech.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=XOBKcbyaEYyqB4OB7pvZzKwY6Ph0I4q2FC7TbrkiL64=; b=uEZqtL/bFtPkIQ F6zJhvjXQFx6u0YRzuNujth/K3BZAp5qY53hMoEZKaOZ0yDGF9DI/Er0dUlKzviRjnAmWdXyquTgc TLVs0xqxXMpp/M9yb7w+y0tnXMhBs8m0eOpgLA9qOO0jGgGOBShWXvzSTrHggsZ2IWDswUmSo0nL/ 6bHbgmbJEYTOvPd1xFZIiKvRPuHpxyFX9mfzSZ5SBlnRC4mfLhw31Y3WSNPhpugaYH9aPW1izuHis t+AGpHmoDUCFOiN78q9Edsy8CsdiiDKTG3p8OFyoKmEQv5eDsUxVjXKw10Zs+5Q2+uFWgRsqACfDm 4uiJazc4DxR+0Cv2cYtg==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ghZQo-00056B-0p; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 12:27:30 +0000 Received: from gloria.sntech.de ([185.11.138.130]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ghZQ8-0004WH-61; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 12:27:25 +0000 Received: from wf0848.dip.tu-dresden.de ([141.76.183.80] helo=phil.localnet) by gloria.sntech.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ghZQ4-00032m-Ao; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 13:26:44 +0100 From: Heiko Stuebner To: Enric Balletbo i Serra Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] phy: phy-rockchip-inno-usb2: drop reading the utmi-avalid property Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 13:26:43 +0100 Message-ID: <5125335.cuvu72hbmo@phil> In-Reply-To: <20190109171415.9954-1-enric.balletbo@collabora.com> References: <20190109171415.9954-1-enric.balletbo@collabora.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190110_042648_605619_BFD962B8 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.21 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: groeck@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kishon Vijay Abraham I , linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com, kernel@collabora.com, bleung@chromium.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Am Mittwoch, 9. Januar 2019, 18:14:15 CET schrieb Enric Balletbo i Serra: > That property is no used in mainline and is not documented. The only > board using that property is the rk33-99-evb-rev1 and -rev2 in the > vendor kernel. The existence of a further -rev3 (which also looks way > better cared for compared rev1+2) indicates that the older ones are > probably some sort of preproduction models, where some wiring (on the soc > or board) may have gone wrong. > > It is also not clear why this is a hardware-description or a DT > property, so, as noboby seems to care of this just drop reading that > property. > > Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel