From: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Santosh Shilimkar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: too many timer retries happen when do local timer swtich with broadcast timer
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 16:32:48 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51275058.7010809@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130222103149.GC12140@e102568-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
On Friday 22 February 2013 04:01 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 10:24:00AM +0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> On Fri, 22 Feb 2013, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>>> BTW, Lorenzo off-list mentioned to me about warning in boot-up
>>> which I missed while testing your patch. It will take bit more
>>> time for me to look into it and hence thought of reporting it.
>>>
>>> [ 2.186126] ------------[ cut here ]------------
>>> [ 2.190979] WARNING: at kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c:501
>>> tick_broadcast_oneshot_control+0x1c0/0x21c()
>>
>> Which one is that? tick_broadcast_pending or tick_force_broadcast_mask ?
>
> It is the tick_force_broadcast_mask and I think that's because on all
> systems we are testing, the broadcast timer IRQ is a thundering herd,
> all CPUs get out of idle at once and try to get out of broadcast mode
> at more or less the same time.
>
So the issue comes ups only when the idle state used where CPU wakeup
more or less at same time as Lorenzo mentioned. I have two platforms
where I could test the patch and see the issue only with one platform.
Yesterday I didn't notice the warning because it wasn't seen on that
platform :-) OMAP4 idle entry and exit in deep state is staggered
between CPUs and hence the warning isn't seen. On OMAP5 though,
there is an additional C-state where idle entry/exit for CPU
isn't staggered and I see the issue in that case.
Actually the broad-cast code doesn't expect such a behavior
from CPUs since only the broad-cast affine CPU should wake
up and rest of the CPU should be woken up by the broad-cast
IPIs.
Regards,
Santosh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-22 11:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-20 11:16 too many timer retries happen when do local timer swtich with broadcast timer Jason Liu
2013-02-20 13:33 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-02-21 6:16 ` Jason Liu
2013-02-21 9:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-02-21 10:50 ` Jason Liu
2013-02-21 13:48 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-02-21 15:12 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-21 22:19 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-02-22 10:07 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-22 10:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-02-22 10:30 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-22 10:31 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-02-22 11:02 ` Santosh Shilimkar [this message]
2013-02-22 12:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-02-22 14:48 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-02-22 15:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-02-22 15:26 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-02-22 18:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-02-25 6:12 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-25 6:38 ` Jason Liu
2013-02-25 13:34 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-02-22 10:28 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-02-22 10:26 ` Jason Liu
2013-02-21 10:35 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-02-21 10:49 ` Jason Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51275058.7010809@ti.com \
--to=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).