From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: vfp: fix fpsid register subarchitecture field mask width
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 15:46:18 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5128034A.4000008@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130222182705.GC19527@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>
On 2/22/2013 10:27 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 08:08:05AM +0000, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> From: Steve Muckle <smuckle@codeaurora.org>
>>
>> The subarchitecture field in the fpsid register is 7 bits wide.
>> The topmost bit is used to designate that the subarchitecture
>> designer is not ARM. We use this field to determine which VFP
>> version is supported by the CPU. Since the topmost bit is masked
>> off we detect non-ARM subarchitectures as supporting only
>> HWCAP_VFP and not HWCAP_VFPv3 as it should be for Qualcomm's
>> processors.
> I'm struggling to see why this has anything to do with the hwcaps being set
> incorrectly. What value do you have in fpsid? As far as I can tell, the
> subarchitecture bits 6:0 should start at 0x40 for you, right?
Yes it does.
>
> I can see cases for changing this code, I just don't see why it would go
> wrong in the case you're describing.
VFP_arch = (vfpsid & FPSID_ARCH_MASK) >> FPSID_ARCH_BIT;
causes VFP_arch to be equal to 0 because 0x40 & 0xf == 0.
and then a little bit later we have
if (VFP_arch >= 2) {
elf_hwcap |= HWCAP_VFPv3;
The branch is not taken so we never set VFPv3.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-22 23:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-22 8:08 [PATCH] ARM: vfp: fix fpsid register subarchitecture field mask width Stephen Boyd
2013-02-22 18:27 ` Will Deacon
2013-02-22 23:46 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2013-02-25 11:18 ` Will Deacon
2013-02-26 3:01 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-02-26 17:54 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-27 17:44 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-02-25 17:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-25 20:02 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-27 1:37 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-02-27 11:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5128034A.4000008@codeaurora.org \
--to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).