From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: b-cousson@ti.com (Benoit Cousson)
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 17:19:09 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] ARM: dts: omap3-overo: Add pwm-leds and audio support
In-Reply-To: <512CDDC8.6030307@epfl.ch>
References: <1358963812-19947-1-git-send-email-florian.vaussard@epfl.ch>
 <5101273A.9090800@ti.com> <510F7BEB.1020408@epfl.ch> <51125AFC.10704@ti.com>
 <51135EAC.7010406@ti.com> <512CDDC8.6030307@epfl.ch>
Message-ID: <512CE07D.2050107@ti.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Hi Florian,

On 02/26/2013 05:07 PM, Florian Vaussard wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 02/07/2013 08:58 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 02/06/2013 02:30 PM, Benoit Cousson wrote:
>>>> So a patch is being merged to handle triggers in the case of pwm
>>>> leds [1].
>>>> When done, we will be able to add back the default trigger. Do you want
>>>> to wait on it to merge this series?
>>>
>>> What kind of dependency do we have between these two series? I mean what
>>> will happen if the DTS is merged before the pwm subsystem?
>>>
>>> If that does not generate any regression / crash, then it is OK, if not,
>>> we should take care of the order.
>>
>> In this series the 'linux,default-trigger' property is not added to the
>> pwm-leds node, so it is safe to take this series.
>> I'm sure Florian will send the update to add this flag back for 3.10
>> or for
>> 3.9-rc (the needed patches for PWM and leds-pwm will be in 3.9).
>>
> 
> Yes, it is safe to take this series. I will provide a patch to add back
> the trigger when it is safe to.

OK, great, I'll take the series then.

Thanks,
Benoit