From: robherring2@gmail.com (Rob Herring)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH LINUX v5] xen: event channel arrays are xen_ulong_t and not unsigned long
Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2013 20:45:33 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51340ACD.70904@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1361360886-2956-1-git-send-email-ian.campbell@citrix.com>
On 02/20/2013 05:48 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On ARM we want these to be the same size on 32- and 64-bit.
>
> This is an ABI change on ARM. X86 does not change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
> Cc: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
> Cc: Keir (Xen.org) <keir@xen.org>
> Cc: Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
> Cc: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> Cc: xen-devel at lists.xen.org
> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
> ---
> Changes since V4
> Rebase onto v3.8
> Fix wording of comment
> Fix bitmask length passed to find_first_bit, need sizeof*8 for bits not just
> sizeof. Use BITS_PER_EVTCHN_WORD and provide a convenience wrapper.
> Changes since V3
> s/read_evtchn_pending_sel/xchg_xen_ulong/ in a comment.
> Changes since V2
> Add comments about the correct bitops to use, and on the ordering/barrier
> requirements on xchg_xen_ulong.
> Changes since V1
> use find_first_set not __ffs
> fix some more unsigned long -> xen_ulong_t
> use more generic xchg_xen_ulong instead of ...read_evtchn...
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/xen/events.h | 22 +++++++
> arch/x86/include/asm/xen/events.h | 3 +
> drivers/xen/events.c | 115 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> include/xen/interface/xen.h | 8 +-
> 4 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
>
I'm seeing some some build failures on randconfig builds with this change:
/tmp/ccJaIZOW.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/ccJaIZOW.s:831: Error: even register required -- `ldrexd r5,r6,[r4]'
This is with ubuntu 12.04 cross compiler (gcc version 4.6.3
(Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.3-1ubuntu5)).
This register restriction is on ARM, but not Thumb builds. Comparing
this to atomic64_cmpxchg, I don't see how to fix this. Perhaps Will or
Nico have thoughts.
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/xen/events.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/xen/events.h
> index 94b4e90..5c27696 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/xen/events.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/xen/events.h
> @@ -15,4 +15,26 @@ static inline int xen_irqs_disabled(struct pt_regs *regs)
> return raw_irqs_disabled_flags(regs->ARM_cpsr);
> }
>
> +/*
> + * We cannot use xchg because it does not support 8-byte
> + * values. However it is safe to use {ldr,dtd}exd directly because all
> + * platforms which Xen can run on support those instructions.
Why does atomic64_cmpxchg not work here?
> + */
> +static inline xen_ulong_t xchg_xen_ulong(xen_ulong_t *ptr, xen_ulong_t val)
> +{
> + xen_ulong_t oldval;
> + unsigned int tmp;
> +
> + wmb();
Based on atomic64_cmpxchg implementation, you could use smp_mb here
which avoids an outer cache flush.
> + asm volatile("@ xchg_xen_ulong\n"
> + "1: ldrexd %0, %H0, [%3]\n"
> + " strexd %1, %2, %H2, [%3]\n"
> + " teq %1, #0\n"
> + " bne 1b"
> + : "=&r" (oldval), "=&r" (tmp)
> + : "r" (val), "r" (ptr)
> + : "memory", "cc");
And a smp_mb is needed here.
Rob
> + return oldval;
> +}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-04 2:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-19 14:48 [PATCH V2] xen: event channel arrays are xen_ulong_t and not unsigned long Ian Campbell
2013-02-19 14:49 ` [PATCH LINUX] " Ian Campbell
2013-02-19 17:11 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-02-19 17:17 ` Ian Campbell
2013-02-19 17:26 ` Tim Deegan
2013-02-19 17:28 ` Ian Campbell
2013-02-19 14:49 ` [PATCH XEN] " Ian Campbell
2013-02-19 16:42 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-02-21 17:16 ` Ian Campbell
2013-02-21 18:43 ` Keir Fraser
2013-02-22 8:28 ` Ian Campbell
2013-02-22 8:12 ` Jan Beulich
2013-02-22 8:28 ` Ian Campbell
2013-02-22 8:48 ` Jan Beulich
2013-02-22 8:55 ` Ian Campbell
2013-02-22 9:05 ` Jan Beulich
2013-02-19 17:27 ` [PATCH LINUX v3] " Ian Campbell
2013-02-19 17:29 ` [PATCH LINUX v4] " Ian Campbell
2013-02-19 18:12 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-02-19 18:43 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-02-20 2:07 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-02-20 3:09 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-02-20 9:13 ` Ian Campbell
2013-02-20 11:48 ` [PATCH LINUX v5] " Ian Campbell
2013-02-21 17:11 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-03-04 2:45 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2013-03-05 3:04 ` Will Deacon
2013-03-05 3:45 ` Ian Campbell
2013-03-05 6:55 ` Rob Herring
2013-03-05 7:03 ` Ian Campbell
2013-03-05 8:08 ` Will Deacon
2013-03-05 9:29 ` Ian Campbell
2013-03-07 3:17 ` Will Deacon
2013-03-07 7:17 ` Ian Campbell
2013-03-05 3:56 ` Ian Campbell
2013-03-05 14:04 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51340ACD.70904@gmail.com \
--to=robherring2@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).