From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd) Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 18:55:01 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: perf: Fix section mismatch on armpmu_init() In-Reply-To: <20130305024338.GA17735@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1362438937-28143-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <20130305024338.GA17735@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> Message-ID: <51355E85.7010804@codeaurora.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 03/04/13 18:43, Will Deacon wrote: > On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 11:15:37PM +0000, Stephen Boyd wrote: >> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0xfb80): Section mismatch in reference >> from the function armpmu_register() to the function >> .init.text:armpmu_init() >> The function armpmu_register() references >> the function __init armpmu_init(). >> This is often because armpmu_register lacks a __init >> annotation or the annotation of armpmu_init is wrong. >> >> Just drop the __init marking on armpmu_init() because >> armpmu_register() no longer has an __init marking. >> >> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd > Cheers Stephen: > > Acked-by: Will Deacon > > Can you put this into the patch system please? > > Thanks. 7667/1 -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation