From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: gang.chen@asianux.com (Chen Gang) Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 11:13:47 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] ARM:vexpress: beautify code, using 'static const' instead of 'const static' In-Reply-To: References: <513BF001.30204@asianux.com> Message-ID: <513BFA6B.7000702@asianux.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org ? 2013?03?10? 10:57, Viresh Kumar ??: > On 10 March 2013 07:59, Chen Gang wrote: >> > >> > better using 'static const' instead of 'const static' >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Chen Gang >> > --- >> > arch/arm/mach-vexpress/platsmp.c | 2 +- >> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >> > >> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/platsmp.c b/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/platsmp.c >> > index dc1ace5..9152bf7 100644 >> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/platsmp.c >> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/platsmp.c >> > @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ static struct map_desc vexpress_dt_cortex_a9_scu_map __initdata = { >> > >> > static void *vexpress_dt_cortex_a9_scu_base __initdata; >> > >> > -const static char *vexpress_dt_cortex_a9_match[] __initconst = { >> > +static const char *vexpress_dt_cortex_a9_match[] __initconst = { > Acked-by: Viresh Kumar > > thank you. :-) -- Chen Gang Asianux Corporation