From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: francescolavra.fl@gmail.com (Francesco Lavra) Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 16:58:19 +0100 Subject: [PATCH V2] cpufreq: ARM big LITTLE: Add generic cpufreq driver and its DT glue In-Reply-To: <6cba8f153cfd4b0d3075a34a6dfe287bdec2eb06.1362676407.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> References: <6cba8f153cfd4b0d3075a34a6dfe287bdec2eb06.1362676407.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Message-ID: <513CAD9B.908@gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, On 03/07/2013 06:14 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > big LITTLE is ARM's new Architecture focussing power/performance needs of modern > world. More information about big LITTLE can be found here: > > http://www.arm.com/products/processors/technologies/biglittleprocessing.php > http://lwn.net/Articles/481055/ > > In order to keep cpufreq support for all big LITTLE platforms simple/generic, > this patch tries to add a generic cpufreq driver layer for all big LITTLE > platforms. > > The driver is divided into two parts: > - Core driver: Generic and shared across all big LITTLE SoC's > - Glue drivers: Per platform drivers providing ops to the core driver > > This patch adds in a generic glue driver which would extract information from > Device Tree. > > Future SoC's can either reuse the DT glue or write their own depending on the > need. > > Signed-off-by: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar [...] > +void bL_cpufreq_unregister(struct cpufreq_arm_bL_ops *ops) > +{ > + if (arm_bL_ops != ops) { > + pr_info("%s: Registered with: %s, can't unregister, exiting\n", > + __func__, arm_bL_ops->name); > + } The code is not doing what the info message says. > + > + cpufreq_unregister_driver(&bL_cpufreq_driver); > + pr_info("%s: Un-registered platform driver: %s\n", __func__, > + arm_bL_ops->name); > + arm_bL_ops = NULL; > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bL_cpufreq_unregister); -- Francesco