From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ldewangan@nvidia.com (Laxman Dewangan) Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 15:41:02 +0530 Subject: [PATCH V2 0/5] ARM: DT: tegra114: Add DT entry for different controller In-Reply-To: <513E5771.9000408@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1362852678-13421-1-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com> <513E5771.9000408@wwwdotorg.org> Message-ID: <513EFF36.50107@nvidia.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tuesday 12 March 2013 03:45 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 03/09/2013 11:11 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote: >> This patch series add DT entry for APB DMA, I2C, UART, KBC and SPI. >> >> This patch series is generated on top of CCF work for T114 done by Peter >> and hence it should be applied on top of T114 CCF patches. >> >> Changes from V1: >> - Add reeason why APBDMA is not compatible with older driver >> in description. >> - Remove UARTB car id correction. Make the compatible with tegra114 and >> older chip. >> - Add compatible for kbc as nvidia,tegra114-kbc and nvidia,tegra20-kbc. >> >> Laxman Dewangan (5): >> ARM: DT: tegra114: add APB DMA controller DT entry >> ARM: DT: tegra114: Add i2c controller DT entry >> ARM: DT: tegra114:add aliases and DMA requestor for serial controller >> ARM: DT: tegra114: add KBC controller DT entry >> ARM: DT: tegra114: Add spi controller DT entry > What branch is this series based on? I tried to apply these for testing, > but git am failed to apply it to Tegra's for-3.10/dt, and Tegra's > for-next, and my local work branch, and next-20130307. > > Can you please rebase onto Tegra's for-3.10/dt. Thanks. I created the patch as: - linux next 20130307 - Then add all clock changes from Peter's git://nv-tegra.nvidia.com/user/pdeschrijver/linux.git - Then I generated the DT entry on top of this which has clock reference. In your 3.10/DT, there is no change for Peter's clock change and possibly this is the reason. If I base my change on your 3.10/DT then: - Do I need to add the clock entry for all modules also?