From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd)
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 13:26:40 -0700
Subject: [PATCH v2 07/11] ssbi: Use regular init level
In-Reply-To: <1363113716-25897-8-git-send-email-davidb@codeaurora.org>
References: <1362616187-21089-1-git-send-email-davidb@codeaurora.org>
 <1363113716-25897-1-git-send-email-davidb@codeaurora.org>
 <1363113716-25897-8-git-send-email-davidb@codeaurora.org>
Message-ID: <513F8F80.1070409@codeaurora.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 03/12/13 11:41, David Brown wrote:
> With device tree, and deferred probe, it is no longer necessary to
> make sure that the ssbi bus driver is initialized very early.  Restore
> to a regular module_init().
>
> Signed-off-by: David Brown <davidb@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  drivers/ssbi/ssbi.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ssbi/ssbi.c b/drivers/ssbi/ssbi.c
> index 7ae8925..6878e55 100644
> --- a/drivers/ssbi/ssbi.c
> +++ b/drivers/ssbi/ssbi.c
> @@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ static int __init msm_ssbi_init(void)
>  {
>  	return platform_driver_register(&msm_ssbi_driver);
>  }
> -postcore_initcall(msm_ssbi_init);
> +module_init(msm_ssbi_init);
>  
>  static void __exit msm_ssbi_exit(void)
>  {

With this change we can use module_platform_driver() too.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation