From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: r.sricharan@ti.com (Sricharan R)
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 09:28:51 +0530
Subject: [PATCH V6] ARM: LPAE: Fix mapping in alloc_init_section for
 unaligned addresses
In-Reply-To: <51261288.5030806@ti.com>
References: <1360574009-12429-1-git-send-email-r.sricharan@ti.com>
 <20130211131230.GA5676@MacBook-Pro.local> <5118F796.3080308@ti.com>
 <51261288.5030806@ti.com>
Message-ID: <51414AFB.9080403@ti.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Thursday 21 February 2013 05:56 PM, R Sricharan wrote:
> Hi,
> On Monday 11 February 2013 07:22 PM, R Sricharan wrote:
>> Hi Russell,
>>
>> On Monday 11 February 2013 06:42 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 09:13:29AM +0000, R Sricharan wrote:
>>>> +static void __init alloc_init_pmd(pud_t *pud, unsigned long addr,
>>>> +                      unsigned long end, phys_addr_t phys,
>>>> +                      const struct mem_type *type)
>>>> +{
>>>> +    pmd_t *pmd = pmd_offset(pud, addr);
>>>> +    unsigned long next;
>>>> +
>>>> +    do {
>>>>           /*
>>>> -         * No need to loop; pte's aren't interested in the
>>>> -         * individual L1 entries.
>>>> +         * With LPAE, we must loop over to map
>>>> +         * all the pmds for the given range.
>>>>            */
>>>> -        alloc_init_pte(pmd, addr, end, __phys_to_pfn(phys), type);
>>>> -    }
>>>> +        next = pmd_addr_end(addr, end);
>>>> +
>>>> +        /*
>>>> +         * Try a section mapping - end, addr and phys must all be
>>>> +         * aligned to a section boundary.
>>>> +         */
>>>
>>> Should this read "next, addr and phys" instead of "end..."?
>>>
>>> Otherwise:
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
>>>
>>   Can I put this in to patch system ?
>
>    Ping..
>
> Regards,
>  Sricharan
 Ping again..

Regards,
 Sricharan