From: marc.zyngier@arm.com (Marc Zyngier)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] ARM: at91: introduce SAMA5 support
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 17:27:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51420885.60006@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1363280736-23624-5-git-send-email-ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
On 14/03/13 17:05, ludovic.desroches at atmel.com wrote:
> From: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
>
> This patch introduces the SAMA5 support. It also updates the PMC driver to
> manage clock division which is a requirement since some peripherals can't work
> at the bus frequency on SAMA5.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
> Tested-by: Robert Nelson <robertcnelson@gmail.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile | 5 +
> arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d3.dtsi | 1031 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d31ek.dts | 51 ++
> arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d33ek.dts | 44 ++
> arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d34ek.dts | 61 ++
> arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d35ek.dts | 56 ++
> arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d3xcm.dtsi | 91 +++
> arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d3xdm.dtsi | 42 ++
> arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d3xmb.dtsi | 166 +++++
> arch/arm/configs/sama5_defconfig | 181 +++++
> arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig | 33 +
> arch/arm/mach-at91/Makefile | 4 +
> arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt-sama5.c | 86 +++
> arch/arm/mach-at91/clock.c | 109 ++-
> arch/arm/mach-at91/clock.h | 2 +
> arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/at91_pmc.h | 18 +-
> arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/cpu.h | 20 +
> arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/sama5d3.h | 73 ++
> arch/arm/mach-at91/sama5d3.c | 377 ++++++++++
> arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c | 27 +
> arch/arm/mach-at91/soc.h | 5 +
> 21 files changed, 2453 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d3.dtsi
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d31ek.dts
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d33ek.dts
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d34ek.dts
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d35ek.dts
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d3xcm.dtsi
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d3xdm.dtsi
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d3xmb.dtsi
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/configs/sama5_defconfig
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt-sama5.c
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/sama5d3.h
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-at91/sama5d3.c
So I haven't started reviewing this yet, but looking at the diffstat, I
can't help but think this patch could use some splitting to be more
easily reviewable.
How about having one patch for the clock stuff, one for the config, one
for the DT, and finally one for the SoC support itself?
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-14 17:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-14 17:05 [PATCH v2 0/4] SAMA5D3 support ludovic.desroches at atmel.com
2013-03-14 17:05 ` [PATCH 1/4] ARM: at91: change name template in AT91_SOC_START macro ludovic.desroches at atmel.com
2013-03-14 17:05 ` [PATCH 2/4] ARM: at91: add AT91_SAM9_TIME entry to select at91sam926x_time.c compilation ludovic.desroches at atmel.com
2013-03-14 17:05 ` [PATCH 3/4] ARM: at91: introduce the core type choice to split ARMv4/5 and ARMv7 arch ludovic.desroches at atmel.com
2013-03-14 17:05 ` [PATCH 4/4] ARM: at91: introduce SAMA5 support ludovic.desroches at atmel.com
2013-03-14 17:27 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2013-03-19 11:23 ` ludovic.desroches at atmel.com
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-03-08 15:13 [PATCH 0/4] SAMA5D3 support ludovic.desroches at atmel.com
2013-03-08 15:13 ` [PATCH 4/4] ARM: at91: introduce SAMA5 support ludovic.desroches at atmel.com
2013-03-08 16:40 ` Joachim Eastwood
2013-03-08 16:52 ` Ludovic Desroches
[not found] ` <513a1756.e94aec0a.1f22.6694SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2013-03-08 17:18 ` Joachim Eastwood
2013-03-08 18:56 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2013-03-08 21:27 ` Joachim Eastwood
2013-03-11 12:35 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2013-03-13 14:35 ` Nicolas Ferre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51420885.60006@arm.com \
--to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).