From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: smp: Allow real broadcast device selection instead of always dummy
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 12:41:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <514227D8.9010205@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130314102807.GG13483@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
On 03/14/13 03:28, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 07:45:14AM +0000, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>> On Wednesday 13 March 2013 09:48 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 03:44:03PM +0000, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>>>> On Wednesday 13 March 2013 05:55 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>>>> I do agree it'd be worth lowering the dummy timer's rating to ensure it doesn't
>>>>> override a real timer elsewhere.
>>>>>
>>>> Yep. Can I add you acked-by tag then for $subject patch ?
>>>> Would be good to get this one merged as well.
>>> Sure. Though could you reword the commit message? The patch solves the more
>>> general issue of a dummy being preferred over real hardware even outside of
>>> choosing the broadcast device.
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>> Thanks. For record, patch is in end of the email which I plan
>> to put into patch system.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Santosh
> The below patch seems fine. Are you intending for this to go in as a fix for
> 3.9-rc*, or as a cleanup for 3.10?
>
> If you're aiming for the latter, it's going to clash with Stephen Boyd's local
> timer API removal [1], in which the generic dummy timer driver [2] (replacing
> the arm-specific dummy [3]) also has a rating of 100.
Thanks for the heads up. Looks like the conflict will be trivial, but I
wonder why need to put the patch at all? Per my understanding the
regression has been fixed by your patch in Thomas' tree and then in 3.10
we can merge the local timer removal patches and fix up the rating at
the same time.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-14 19:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-13 9:06 [PATCH] ARM: smp: Allow real broadcast device selection instead of always dummy Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-13 9:28 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-13 10:16 ` Mark Rutland
2013-03-13 11:24 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-13 12:25 ` Mark Rutland
2013-03-13 15:44 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-13 16:18 ` Mark Rutland
2013-03-14 7:45 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-14 8:50 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-14 10:28 ` Mark Rutland
2013-03-14 10:46 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-14 19:41 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2013-03-13 14:19 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-13 15:37 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-13 18:31 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-14 6:09 ` Santosh Shilimkar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=514227D8.9010205@codeaurora.org \
--to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).