From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: nsekhar@ti.com (Sekhar Nori)
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 10:38:58 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: davinci: da850: Enable EHRPWM TBCLK from
 CFG_CHIP1
In-Reply-To: <518397C60809E147AF5323E0420B992E3EA97355@DBDE01.ent.ti.com>
References: <1363257453-24747-1-git-send-email-avinashphilip@ti.com>
 <1363257453-24747-3-git-send-email-avinashphilip@ti.com>
 <5141CA40.9010005@ti.com>
 <518397C60809E147AF5323E0420B992E3EA97355@DBDE01.ent.ti.com>
Message-ID: <5142ACEA.4060305@ti.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 3/15/2013 10:27 AM, Philip, Avinash wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 18:31:52, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
>> On 3/14/2013 4:07 PM, Philip Avinash wrote:
>>> da850 platforms require TBCLK synchronization in CFG_CHIP1 register for
>>> TBCLK enable in EHRPWM modules. Enabling of TBCLK is done only if EHRPWM
>>> DT node status is set to "okay" DT blob.
>>> Also adds macro definitions for DA8XX_EHRPWM_TBCLKSYNC and
>>> DA8XX_CFGCHIP1_REG.
>>
>> So there is actually a TBCLK in DA850 - it's just not modeled as a clock
>> similar to the way it is done on AM335x? If yes, then instead of adding
>> a dummy clock node and doing the TBCLK enable as part of init, why not
>> model TBCLK in clock tree even on DA850?
> 
> 
> TBCLK enabling should done from platform specific way. In DA850 it is done at
> CFGCHIP1 register. Unfortunately Davinci clock frame work will support only
> clock nodes inside PLLC and PSC modules. Handling of CFGCHP1 require

That's true at the moment, but that can be fixed.

> modifications in clock frame work.
> 
> Hence handling it as part of initialization.

I am curious as to how this clock is handled in am335x. I searched for
tbclk in arch/arm/ of linux-next but could not find any references.
Where should I be looking?

Thanks,
Sekhar