From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: swarren@wwwdotorg.org (Stephen Warren) Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 15:43:26 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] clk: add table lookup to mux In-Reply-To: <20130319213706.8663.87186@quantum> References: <1363113747-6572-1-git-send-email-pdeschrijver@nvidia.com> <513F79BA.7000608@wwwdotorg.org> <20130319213706.8663.87186@quantum> Message-ID: <5148DBFE.3040402@wwwdotorg.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 03/19/2013 03:37 PM, Mike Turquette wrote: > Quoting Stephen Warren (2013-03-12 11:53:46) >> On 03/12/2013 12:42 PM, Peter De Schrijver wrote: >>> Add a table lookup feature to the mux clock. Also allow arbitrary masks >>> instead of the width. This will be used by some clocks on Tegra114. Also >>> adapt the tegra periph clk because it uses struct clk_mux directly. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Peter De Schrijver >>> >>> -- >>> Mike, >>> >>> This is the same patch I posted before which implements a table lookup >>> feature for the mux clock. I squashed both the changes to clk-mux.c and >>> tegra/clk.h together in order to make the patch bisectable. >> >> For the record in this thread, this is a dependency of the Tegra114 >> clock driver. Can this patch be added to a stable branch in the clk or >> arm-soc trees, which I can merge before applying the Tegra114 clock >> driver? Thanks. > > Yes. I don't have an immutable branch today, but I will have one by > -rc4. It will be named clk-for-3.10. Perhaps this series could be merged into an immutable topic branch of its own. That could then be merged into your clk-for-3.10, and Tegra's branch, and reduce the number of commits that get merged into the Tegra tree from outside?