[LAKML][Users getting knocked of from list]

[LAKML][Users getting knocked of from list]

[Santosh Shilimkar]

Russell,

In last couple of months, I have observed that users are getting knocked off
from LAKML often. I myself faced it 2 times so far and I heard similar complaint
at least from 5 more folks.

Is there a change in settings or something new which started triggering this ?

Regards,
Santosh

[LAKML][Users getting knocked of from list]

[Sekhar Nori]

On 3/20/2013 11:51 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> Russell,
> 
> In last couple of months, I have observed that users are getting knocked off
> from LAKML often. I myself faced it 2 times so far and I heard similar complaint
> at least from 5 more folks.
> 
> Is there a change in settings or something new which started triggering this ?

Can you login to mailman at
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel and see if
provides information on this? I too got knocked out and it was
apparently because of "too many bounces". It maintains a bounce score
and mine is currently 2.0 out of total of 5.0.

I have no clue why my address should bounce.

Thanks,
Sekhar

[LAKML][Users getting knocked of from list]

[Santosh Shilimkar]

On Wednesday 20 March 2013 12:12 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> On 3/20/2013 11:51 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>> Russell,
>>
>> In last couple of months, I have observed that users are getting knocked off
>> from LAKML often. I myself faced it 2 times so far and I heard similar complaint
>> at least from 5 more folks.
>>
>> Is there a change in settings or something new which started triggering this ?
> 
> Can you login to mailman at
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel and see if
> provides information on this? I too got knocked out and it was
> apparently because of "too many bounces". It maintains a bounce score
> and mine is currently 2.0 out of total of 5.0.
> 
Looks like same reason for me as well.

> I have no clue why my address should bounce.
> 
Me neither.

Regards,
santosh

[LAKML][Users getting knocked of from list]

[Russell King - ARM Linux]

On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:51:40AM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> Russell,
> 
> In last couple of months, I have observed that users are getting knocked off
> from LAKML often. I myself faced it 2 times so far and I heard similar complaint
> at least from 5 more folks.
> 
> Is there a change in settings or something new which started triggering this ?

Exactly the same thing happened to me earlier this week.  I don't have
anything to do with the lists anymore, so I'm not the right person to ask.

David Woodhouse runs the servers, and Vince Sanders does the admin.

[LAKML][Users getting knocked of from list]

[Santosh Shilimkar]

Looping David

On Wednesday 20 March 2013 03:10 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:51:40AM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>> Russell,
>>
>> In last couple of months, I have observed that users are getting knocked off
>> from LAKML often. I myself faced it 2 times so far and I heard similar complaint
>> at least from 5 more folks.
>>
>> Is there a change in settings or something new which started triggering this ?
> 
> Exactly the same thing happened to me earlier this week.  I don't have
> anything to do with the lists anymore, so I'm not the right person to ask.
> 
> David Woodhouse runs the servers, and Vince Sanders does the admin.
> 
Thanks Russell for the contact.

Regards,
Santosh

TI users about to be banned from all lists.infradead.org mailing lists (was Re: [LAKML][Users getting knocked of from list])

[David Woodhouse]

On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 13:59 +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 March 2013 12:12 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> > I have no clue why my address should bounce.
> > 
> Me neither.

TI's incoming mail appears to be broken. For days at a time, it is
simply giving a '421 Service Temporarily Unavailable' error to incoming
mail.

This is a *temporary* error, so the messages sit on the list server's
queue until they time out (5 or 7 days, IIRC) and then are finally
considered to have bounced. I currently have 38865 messages for 32
separate @ti.com recipients clogging up the mail queue.

Here are some recent failed delivery attempts:

2013-03-20 09:18:41 +0000 1UIF8B-00011C-7Q == santosh.shilimkar at ti.com R=lookuph
ost T=verp_smtp defer (-44): SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:<s
antosh.shilimkar@ti.com>: host cluster5a.us.messagelabs.com [216.82.251.230]: 42
1 Service Temporarily Unavailable

2013-03-20 09:33:49 +0000 1UDY5k-0002SY-Po == nsekhar at ti.com R=lookuphost T=verp
_smtp defer (-44): SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:<nsekhar@ti.
com>: host cluster5a.us.messagelabs.com [216.82.251.230]: 421 Service Temporaril
y Unavailable

Please report this to your IT department (it looks like it might be a
problem at messagelabs.com rather than in-house), and be aware that I am
on the verge of just banning *all* @ti.com addresses from all lists
until it's fixed. 

I wonder if you'll even receive this message, but perhaps you'll see it
in the archives?

-- 
dwmw2

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 6171 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20130320/49aa48b4/attachment.bin>

TI users about to be banned from all lists.infradead.org mailing lists (was Re: [LAKML][Users getting knocked of from list])

[Santosh Shilimkar]

On Wednesday 20 March 2013 04:02 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 13:59 +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>> On Wednesday 20 March 2013 12:12 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>>> I have no clue why my address should bounce.
>>>
>> Me neither.
> 
> TI's incoming mail appears to be broken. For days at a time, it is
> simply giving a '421 Service Temporarily Unavailable' error to incoming
> mail.
> 
> This is a *temporary* error, so the messages sit on the list server's
> queue until they time out (5 or 7 days, IIRC) and then are finally
> considered to have bounced. I currently have 38865 messages for 32
> separate @ti.com recipients clogging up the mail queue.
> 
> Here are some recent failed delivery attempts:
> 
> 2013-03-20 09:18:41 +0000 1UIF8B-00011C-7Q == santosh.shilimkar at ti.com R=lookuph
> ost T=verp_smtp defer (-44): SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:<s
> antosh.shilimkar at ti.com>: host cluster5a.us.messagelabs.com [216.82.251.230]: 42
> 1 Service Temporarily Unavailable
> 
> 2013-03-20 09:33:49 +0000 1UDY5k-0002SY-Po == nsekhar at ti.com R=lookuphost T=verp
> _smtp defer (-44): SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:<nsekhar@ti.
> com>: host cluster5a.us.messagelabs.com [216.82.251.230]: 421 Service Temporaril
> y Unavailable
> 
> Please report this to your IT department (it looks like it might be a
Will do report the issue to TI IT team. Thanks for letting know about the
problem.
> problem at messagelabs.com rather than in-house), and be aware that I am
> on the verge of just banning *all* @ti.com addresses from all lists
> until it's fixed. 
> 
Please don't do that. We will try to get this sorted out and keep
you posted on the progress.

Thanks for help

Regards
Santosh