From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd) Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 10:33:55 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] irqchip: gic: fix irq_trigger return In-Reply-To: <1363734349-32635-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> References: <1363734349-32635-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> Message-ID: <5151DC03.6070108@codeaurora.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 03/19/13 16:05, Stephen Boyd wrote: > From: Abhijeet Dharmapurikar > > The genirq layer expects a 0 in case of failure but the code is > returning -ENXIO. Fix it. > > Signed-off-by: Abhijeet Dharmapurikar > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd > --- > drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c > index 644d724..2ebf28a 100644 > --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c > @@ -236,7 +236,8 @@ static int gic_retrigger(struct irq_data *d) > if (gic_arch_extn.irq_retrigger) > return gic_arch_extn.irq_retrigger(d); > > - return -ENXIO; > + /* the genirq layer expects 0 for a failure */ > + return 0; > } > > #ifdef CONFIG_SMP Ping. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation