From: alex.shi@intel.com (Alex Shi)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v3 3/6] sched: pack small tasks
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 12:48:08 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51527A08.8060207@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5152768B.3020306@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On 03/27/2013 12:33 PM, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On 03/26/2013 06:07 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Fri, 2013-03-22 at 13:25 +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>>> +static bool is_light_task(struct task_struct *p)
>>> +{
>>> + /* A light task runs less than 20% in average */
>>> + return ((p->se.avg.runnable_avg_sum * 5) <
>>> + (p->se.avg.runnable_avg_period));
>>> +}
>>
>> OK, so we have a 'problem' here, we initialize runnable_avg_* to 0, but
>> we want to 'assume' a fresh task is fully 'loaded'. IIRC Alex ran into
>> this as well.
>>
>> PJT, do you have any sane solution for this, I forgot what the result
>> of the last discussion was -- was there any?
>
> The conclusion after last discussion between PJT and Alex was that the
> load contribution of a fresh task be set to "full" during "__sched_fork()".
>
> task->se.avg.load_avg_contrib = task->se.load.weight during
> __sched_fork() is reflected in the latest power aware scheduler patchset
> by Alex.
Yes, the new forked runnable load was set as full utilisation in V5
power aware scheduling. PJT, Mike and I both agree on this. PJT just
discussion how to give the full load to new forked task. and we get
agreement in my coming V6 power aware scheduling patchset.
>
> Thanks
>
> Regards
> Preeti U Murthy
>>
>
--
Thanks Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-27 4:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-22 12:25 [RFC PATCH v3 0/6] sched: packing small tasks Vincent Guittot
2013-03-22 12:25 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/6] Revert "sched: Introduce temporary FAIR_GROUP_SCHED dependency for load-tracking" Vincent Guittot
2013-03-22 12:25 ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/6] sched: add a new SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN flag for sched_domain Vincent Guittot
2013-03-22 12:25 ` [RFC PATCH v3 3/6] sched: pack small tasks Vincent Guittot
2013-03-26 12:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-03-27 10:21 ` Preeti U Murthy
2013-03-27 11:00 ` Vincent Guittot
2013-04-26 10:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-26 11:34 ` Vincent Guittot
2013-04-26 10:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-26 10:32 ` Preeti U Murthy
2013-03-26 12:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-03-26 13:00 ` Vincent Guittot
2013-03-27 4:33 ` Preeti U Murthy
2013-03-27 4:48 ` Alex Shi [this message]
2013-03-27 8:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-03-26 12:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-03-26 13:53 ` Vincent Guittot
2013-03-26 15:29 ` Arjan van de Ven
2013-03-27 8:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-03-27 8:54 ` Vincent Guittot
2013-03-27 9:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-03-27 11:18 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-03-27 14:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-03-27 16:36 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-03-27 17:18 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-03-27 17:37 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-03-27 17:20 ` Vincent Guittot
2013-03-27 18:01 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-03-27 15:37 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-03-22 12:25 ` [RFC PATCH v3 4/6] sched: secure access to other CPU statistics Vincent Guittot
2013-03-26 12:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-03-26 13:06 ` Vincent Guittot
2013-03-22 12:25 ` [RFC PATCH v3 5/6] sched: pack the idle load balance Vincent Guittot
2013-03-26 12:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-03-26 14:03 ` Vincent Guittot
2013-03-26 14:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-03-26 15:55 ` Vincent Guittot
2013-03-27 4:56 ` Alex Shi
2013-03-27 8:05 ` Vincent Guittot
2013-03-27 8:47 ` Alex Shi
2013-03-27 10:30 ` Vincent Guittot
2013-03-27 13:32 ` Alex Shi
2013-03-27 8:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-05 11:08 ` Vincent Guittot
2013-04-22 5:45 ` Preeti U Murthy
[not found] ` <CAKfTPtCCCifC=c+xjjnAH_HSqkR80PiQoddQKXPHuZwZawbvcA@mail.gmail.com>
2013-04-23 2:23 ` Alex Shi
2013-04-23 4:57 ` Preeti U Murthy
2013-04-23 15:30 ` Arjan van de Ven
2013-04-26 10:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-23 4:36 ` Preeti U Murthy
2013-03-22 12:25 ` [RFC PATCH v3 6/6] ARM: sched: clear SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN Vincent Guittot
2013-03-23 11:55 ` [RFC PATCH v3 0/6] sched: packing small tasks Preeti U Murthy
2013-03-25 9:58 ` Vincent Guittot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51527A08.8060207@intel.com \
--to=alex.shi@intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).