From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard) Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 21:26:13 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] arm: sunxi: rename clock compatible strings In-Reply-To: <1364351958-14503-3-git-send-email-emilio@elopez.com.ar> References: <1364351958-14503-1-git-send-email-emilio@elopez.com.ar> <1364351958-14503-3-git-send-email-emilio@elopez.com.ar> Message-ID: <515355E5.3020804@free-electrons.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Le 27/03/2013 03:39, Emilio L?pez a ?crit : > During the introduction of the Allwinner SoC platforms, sunxi was > initially meant as a generic name for all the variants of the Allwinner > SoC. > > It was ok at the time of the support of only the A10 and A13 that > look pretty much the same; but it's beginning to be troublesome with > the future addition of the Allwinner A31 (sun6i) that is quite > different, and would introduce some weird logic, where sunxi would > actually mean in some case sun4i and sun5i but without sun6i... > > Moreover, it makes the compatible strings naming scheme not consistent > with other architectures, where usually for this kind of compability, we > just use the oldest SoC name that has this IP, so let's do just this. > > Signed-off-by: Emilio L?pez Applied, Thanks! -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com