From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: swarren@wwwdotorg.org (Stephen Warren) Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 10:08:31 -0600 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: tegra: move to In-Reply-To: <201303301413.26549.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1364602790-10759-1-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org> <201303301413.26549.arnd@arndb.de> Message-ID: <5159B0FF.2010408@wwwdotorg.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 03/30/2013 08:13 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Saturday 30 March 2013, Stephen Warren wrote: >> From: Stephen Warren >> >> This is required so that code such as Tegra's PCIe and clock drivers >> can still access this header file once Tegra is converted to >> multiplatform, and no longer exists. >> >> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren > > It sounds like this should be integrated in the reset controller API > that Philipp Zabel just posted. I'm not blaming you for now knowing > about it, since I only saw it myself a few days ago, and my interpretation > could be wrong. Are you able to move to that API before 3.10? Well, I wrote the binding for it:-) > If not, we can probably take your patch for now, if you remove it > again for 3.11. There are at least a couple of different things in this file: a) The reset API, which definitely should be converted to the new reset API. I can't make any promises about which kernel release that will happen in, but it's definitely something we know we have to do. b) Power-gating. This should probably be converted to use the powerdomains code. I believe Joseph Lo is aware of this, but again I can't promise any specific time-scale at this time. So is this still OK, without any promises of timescale?