From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: gang.chen@asianux.com (Chen Gang)
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 16:13:16 +0800
Subject: [Suggestion] ARM64:kernel: compiling issue for early_console.
In-Reply-To: <5152DFF1.2090000@asianux.com>
References: <5152DB83.8080703@asianux.com>
 <20130327115509.GA1603@MacBook-Pro.local> <5152DFF1.2090000@asianux.com>
Message-ID: <515BE49C.8040601@asianux.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Hello Maintainers:

  it seems, this issue still exists in next-20130402.

  have you already fixed it in another tree ?

  if really no one fix it within this week, I should try (since I find it).

  thanks.

gchen.


On 2013?03?27? 20:02, Chen Gang wrote:
> On 2013?03?27? 19:55, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:44:03AM +0000, Chen Gang wrote:
>>>>   the error message:
>>>>     arch/arm64/kernel/early_printk.c: At top level:
>>>>     arch/arm64/kernel/early_printk.c:98:23: error: conflicting types for ?early_console?
>>>>     In file included from arch/arm64/kernel/early_printk.c:20:0:
>>>>     include/linux/console.h:145:24: note: previous declaration of ?early_console? was here
>>>>     make[1]: *** [arch/arm64/kernel/early_printk.o] Error 1
>>>>     make: *** [arch/arm64/kernel] Error 2
>> Is this in linux-next? Mainline seems fine.
> 
>   yes, it is in next-20130326 at least :-)
> 
>>
>> I saw some patches from tglx on unifying the various early printk
>> implementations, though not sure whether it's those patches causing it
>> (in which case arm64 needs to be updated as well).
> 
>   maybe, but we need check the details to prove it :-)
> 
> 
>   thanks.
> 


-- 
Chen Gang

Asianux Corporation