From: cov@codeaurora.org (Christopher Covington)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [Suggestion] ARM64:kernel: compiling issue for early_console.
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 07:39:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <515C14FD.4040703@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <515BE49C.8040601@asianux.com>
Hi Chen,
On 04/03/2013 04:13 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
> Hello Maintainers:
>
> it seems, this issue still exists in next-20130402.
>
> have you already fixed it in another tree ?
Maybe somebody else does have a fix, but Catalin mentioned he was going on
vacation for two weeks on March 28th in "[GIT PULL] Preparatory GIC patches
for arm64 support".
> if really no one fix it within this week, I should try (since I find it).
I'm sure a fix would be appreciated.
> On 2013?03?27? 20:02, Chen Gang wrote:
>> On 2013?03?27? 19:55, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:44:03AM +0000, Chen Gang wrote:
>>>>> the error message:
>>>>> arch/arm64/kernel/early_printk.c: At top level:
>>>>> arch/arm64/kernel/early_printk.c:98:23: error: conflicting types for ?early_console?
>>>>> In file included from arch/arm64/kernel/early_printk.c:20:0:
>>>>> include/linux/console.h:145:24: note: previous declaration of ?early_console? was here
>>>>> make[1]: *** [arch/arm64/kernel/early_printk.o] Error 1
>>>>> make: *** [arch/arm64/kernel] Error 2
>>> Is this in linux-next? Mainline seems fine.
>>
>> yes, it is in next-20130326 at least :-)
>>
>>>
>>> I saw some patches from tglx on unifying the various early printk
>>> implementations, though not sure whether it's those patches causing it
>>> (in which case arm64 needs to be updated as well).
I looked briefly and wasn't able to find this patchset.
Regards,
Christopher
--
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by the Linux Foundation.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-03 11:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-27 11:44 [Suggestion] ARM64:kernel: compiling issue for early_console Chen Gang
2013-03-27 11:55 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-03-27 12:02 ` Chen Gang
2013-04-03 8:13 ` Chen Gang
2013-04-03 11:39 ` Christopher Covington [this message]
2013-04-03 13:00 ` Chen Gang
2013-04-17 9:10 ` Chen Gang
2013-04-19 10:53 ` [PATCH] ARM64: kernel: compiling issue, duplicate definition of early_console Chen Gang
2013-04-19 12:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-20 1:55 ` Chen Gang
2013-04-19 12:31 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-04-20 1:54 ` Chen Gang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=515C14FD.4040703@codeaurora.org \
--to=cov@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).