From: deepthi@linux.vnet.ibm.com (Deepthi Dharwar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 9/9] POWERPC: pseries: cpuidle: use time keeping flag
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2013 16:31:35 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <515D5D8F.7010906@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <515C3BF2.7040609@linaro.org>
On 04/03/2013 07:55 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 04/03/2013 02:15 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> The current code computes the idle time but that can be handled
>> by the cpuidle framework if we enable the .en_core_tk_irqen flag.
>>
>> Set the flag and remove the code related to the time computation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>
> Rafael,
>
> Deepthi took the patch, did a fix and tested it, this is why there is
> its signed-off.
>
> Deepthi, could you ack the patch for Rafael also ?
>
> Thanks
> -- Daniel
Signed-off-by: Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/processor_idle.c | 35 ++++++++++-------------
>> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/processor_idle.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/processor_idle.c
>> index 4d806b4..a197120 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/processor_idle.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/processor_idle.c
>> @@ -23,8 +23,9 @@
>> #include "pseries.h"
>>
>> struct cpuidle_driver pseries_idle_driver = {
>> - .name = "pseries_idle",
>> - .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>> + .name = "pseries_idle",
>> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>> + .en_core_tk_irqen = 1,
>> };
>>
>> #define MAX_IDLE_STATE_COUNT 2
>> @@ -33,10 +34,8 @@ static int max_idle_state = MAX_IDLE_STATE_COUNT - 1;
>> static struct cpuidle_device __percpu *pseries_cpuidle_devices;
>> static struct cpuidle_state *cpuidle_state_table;
>>
>> -static inline void idle_loop_prolog(unsigned long *in_purr, ktime_t *kt_before)
>> +static inline void idle_loop_prolog(unsigned long *in_purr)
>> {
>> -
>> - *kt_before = ktime_get();
>> *in_purr = mfspr(SPRN_PURR);
>> /*
>> * Indicate to the HV that we are idle. Now would be
>> @@ -45,12 +44,10 @@ static inline void idle_loop_prolog(unsigned long *in_purr, ktime_t *kt_before)
>> get_lppaca()->idle = 1;
>> }
>>
>> -static inline s64 idle_loop_epilog(unsigned long in_purr, ktime_t kt_before)
>> +static inline void idle_loop_epilog(unsigned long in_purr)
>> {
>> get_lppaca()->wait_state_cycles += mfspr(SPRN_PURR) - in_purr;
>> get_lppaca()->idle = 0;
>> -
>> - return ktime_to_us(ktime_sub(ktime_get(), kt_before));
>> }
>>
>> static int snooze_loop(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>> @@ -58,10 +55,9 @@ static int snooze_loop(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>> int index)
>> {
>> unsigned long in_purr;
>> - ktime_t kt_before;
>> int cpu = dev->cpu;
>>
>> - idle_loop_prolog(&in_purr, &kt_before);
>> + idle_loop_prolog(&in_purr);
>> local_irq_enable();
>> set_thread_flag(TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG);
>>
>> @@ -75,8 +71,8 @@ static int snooze_loop(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>> clear_thread_flag(TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG);
>> smp_mb();
>>
>> - dev->last_residency =
>> - (int)idle_loop_epilog(in_purr, kt_before);
>> + idle_loop_epilog(in_purr);
>> +
>> return index;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -102,9 +98,8 @@ static int dedicated_cede_loop(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>> int index)
>> {
>> unsigned long in_purr;
>> - ktime_t kt_before;
>>
>> - idle_loop_prolog(&in_purr, &kt_before);
>> + idle_loop_prolog(&in_purr);
>> get_lppaca()->donate_dedicated_cpu = 1;
>>
>> ppc64_runlatch_off();
>> @@ -112,8 +107,9 @@ static int dedicated_cede_loop(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>> check_and_cede_processor();
>>
>> get_lppaca()->donate_dedicated_cpu = 0;
>> - dev->last_residency =
>> - (int)idle_loop_epilog(in_purr, kt_before);
>> +
>> + idle_loop_epilog(in_purr);
>> +
>> return index;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -122,9 +118,8 @@ static int shared_cede_loop(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>> int index)
>> {
>> unsigned long in_purr;
>> - ktime_t kt_before;
>>
>> - idle_loop_prolog(&in_purr, &kt_before);
>> + idle_loop_prolog(&in_purr);
>>
>> /*
>> * Yield the processor to the hypervisor. We return if
>> @@ -135,8 +130,8 @@ static int shared_cede_loop(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>> */
>> check_and_cede_processor();
>>
>> - dev->last_residency =
>> - (int)idle_loop_epilog(in_purr, kt_before);
>> + idle_loop_epilog(in_purr);
>> +
>> return index;
>> }
>>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-04 11:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-03 12:15 [PATCH 1/9] ARM: cpuidle: remove useless declaration Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-03 12:15 ` [PATCH 2/9] ARM: shmobile: pm: fix init sections Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-03 12:15 ` [PATCH 3/9] ARM: shmobile: cpuidle: remove useless WFI function Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-03 12:15 ` [PATCH 4/9] ARM: tegra2: cpuidle: change driver initialization Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-03 12:15 ` [PATCH 5/9] ARM: tegra: cpuidle: remove useless initialization Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-03 12:15 ` [PATCH 6/9] ARM: davinci: cpuidle: fix wrong enter function Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-04 7:16 ` Sekhar Nori
2013-04-03 12:15 ` [PATCH 7/9] intel: cpuidle: remove stop/start critical timings Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-04 22:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-04-07 20:52 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-08 17:40 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-08 19:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-04-08 19:27 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-19 22:02 ` Len Brown
2013-04-03 12:15 ` [PATCH 8/9] ARM: omap3: cpuidle: enable time keeping Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-03 17:47 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-04-03 20:49 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-03 21:43 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-04-03 12:15 ` [PATCH 9/9] POWERPC: pseries: cpuidle: use time keeping flag Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-03 14:25 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-04 11:01 ` Deepthi Dharwar [this message]
2013-04-03 12:23 ` [PATCH 1/9] ARM: cpuidle: remove useless declaration Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-08 20:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-04-08 20:53 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-18 14:13 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-04-18 14:31 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-18 15:42 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-04-18 15:47 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-04 22:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=515D5D8F.7010906@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=deepthi@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).