From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org (Daniel Lezcano) Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 21:27:25 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 7/9] intel: cpuidle: remove stop/start critical timings In-Reply-To: <6514915.cyFSTtqpte@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <1364991322-20585-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> <5161DC9C.3020703@linaro.org> <51630115.6040205@linaro.org> <6514915.cyFSTtqpte@vostro.rjw.lan> Message-ID: <51631A1D.3090705@linaro.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 04/08/2013 09:27 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, April 08, 2013 07:40:37 PM Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> On 04/07/2013 10:52 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >>> On 04/05/2013 12:31 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>>> On Wednesday, April 03, 2013 02:15:20 PM Daniel Lezcano wrote: >>>>> The start/stop_critical_timings are called from arch/x86/kernel/process.c >>>>> in the cpu_idle loop function. >>>>> >>>>> Remove the ones in the cpuidle driver. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano >>>> For this one I need an ACK from Len. >>>> >>>> Len, any objections? >>> >>> Len ? ping ... >> >> Rafael, >> >> this patch is not dependent from any patch in the series, is it possible >> you apply the patchset except this patch ? >> >> May be you can apply it later when Len acks it, or I can resend it, no ? >> >> I have a lot of code consolidation patches awaiting for this patchset to >> be merged. > > OK, I'll take the rest of your patches in this series (except for [1/9] > which also is not depended on by anything AFAICS). Thanks Rafael. -- Daniel -- Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog