From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: peter.ujfalusi@ti.com (Peter Ujfalusi)
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 12:20:17 +0200
Subject: [RFC v2] dmaengine: omap-dma: Start DMA without delay for cyclic
 channels
In-Reply-To: <20130409072600.GA31193@intel.com>
References: <1364987862-14597-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
 <51626D88.8020809@ti.com> <20130408170956.GX30923@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
 <20130408171519.GP10155@atomide.com> <5163BAA8.7040502@ti.com>
 <5163C103.8020101@ti.com> <20130409072600.GA31193@intel.com>
Message-ID: <5163EB61.3000507@ti.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 04/09/2013 09:26 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> Yes it should go thru dmaengine tree, sorry was travelling hence the delay, pls
> resend the patch and I will do the needful

I already have the patch rebased on today's linux-next, just waiting for
Russell to confirm that I can add his Acked-by to the patch.
I take this from Russell as ACK: "Now that I'm back from a short 4 day break,
then yes, and the answer is that it's fine.  Who's handling the patch?"

But I want to be sure I can add that line...

-- 
P?ter