From: robherring2@gmail.com (Rob Herring)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 05/18] cpuidle: make a single register function for all
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 09:59:45 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51657E61.9010701@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1365603743-5618-6-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
On 04/10/2013 09:22 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> The usual scheme to initialize a cpuidle driver on a SMP is:
>
> cpuidle_register_driver(drv);
> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> device = &per_cpu(cpuidle_dev, cpu);
> cpuidle_register_device(device);
> }
>
> This code is duplicated in each cpuidle driver.
>
> On UP systems, it is done this way:
>
> cpuidle_register_driver(drv);
> device = &per_cpu(cpuidle_dev, cpu);
> cpuidle_register_device(device);
>
> On UP, the macro 'for_each_cpu' does one iteration:
>
> #define for_each_cpu(cpu, mask) \
> for ((cpu) = 0; (cpu) < 1; (cpu)++, (void)mask)
>
> Hence, the initialization loop is the same for UP than SMP.
>
> Beside, we saw different bugs / mis-initialization / return code unchecked in
> the different drivers, the code is duplicated including bugs. After fixing all
> these ones, it appears the initialization pattern is the same for everyone.
>
> Let's add a wrapper function doing this initialization with a cpumask parameter
> for the coupled idle states and use it for all the drivers.
>
> That will save a lot of LOC, consolidate the code, and the modifications in the
> future could be done in a single place. Another benefit is the consolidation of
> the cpuidle_device variable which is now in the cpuidle framework and no longer
> spread accross the different arch specific drivers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
> ---
Perhaps my ack was too quick...
> +int cpuidle_register(struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
> + const struct cpumask *const coupled_cpus)
> +{
> + int ret, cpu;
> + struct cpuidle_device *device;
> +
> + ret = cpuidle_register_driver(drv);
> + if (ret) {
> + printk(KERN_ERR "failed to register cpuidle driver\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> + device = &per_cpu(cpuidle_dev, cpu);
> + device->cpu = cpu;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_NEEDS_CPU_IDLE_COUPLED
> + device->coupled_cpus = *coupled_cpus;
This needs a NULL check. CONFIG_ARCH_NEEDS_CPU_IDLE_COUPLED is most
likely going to be enabled with multi-platform kernels and this will crash.
Also, I think typically struct copies have a note that it is copy.
Rob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-10 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-10 14:22 [PATCH 00/18] cpuidle: code consolidation Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-10 14:22 ` [PATCH 01/18] ARM: OMAP3: remove cpuidle_wrap_enter Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-10 14:22 ` [PATCH 02/18] cpuidle: remove en_core_tk_irqen flag Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-10 14:22 ` [PATCH 03/18] ARM: ux500: cpuidle: replace for_each_online_cpu by for_each_possible_cpu Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-10 14:22 ` [PATCH 04/18] ARM: imx: cpuidle: create separate drivers for imx5/imx6 Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-12 6:05 ` Shawn Guo
2013-04-12 6:58 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-12 7:11 ` Shawn Guo
2013-04-12 7:12 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-10 14:22 ` [PATCH 05/18] cpuidle: make a single register function for all Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-10 14:59 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2013-04-10 15:05 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-22 6:57 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-10 16:55 ` Andrew Lunn
2013-04-10 18:04 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-10 18:18 ` Andrew Lunn
2013-04-10 22:07 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-10 17:04 ` Andrew Lunn
2013-04-10 18:02 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-10 18:23 ` Andrew Lunn
2013-04-10 19:59 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-10 18:22 ` Colin Cross
2013-04-10 19:59 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-10 14:22 ` [PATCH 06/18] ARM: ux500: cpuidle: use init/exit common routine Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-10 14:22 ` [PATCH 07/18] ARM: at91: " Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-10 14:39 ` Nicolas Ferre
2013-04-10 14:22 ` [PATCH 08/18] ARM: OMAP3: " Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-10 14:22 ` [PATCH 09/18] ARM: s3c64xx: " Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-10 14:22 ` [PATCH 10/18] ARM: tegra1: " Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-10 17:29 ` Stephen Warren
2013-04-10 18:05 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-10 14:22 ` [PATCH 11/18] ARM: shmobile: " Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-11 2:46 ` Simon Horman
2013-04-10 14:22 ` [PATCH 12/18] ARM: OMAP4: " Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-10 14:22 ` [PATCH 13/18] ARM: tegra2: " Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-11 1:01 ` Joseph Lo
2013-04-11 5:58 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-10 14:22 ` [PATCH 14/18] ARM: tegra3: " Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-10 14:22 ` [PATCH 15/18] ARM: calxeda: " Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-10 14:31 ` Rob Herring
2013-04-10 14:22 ` [PATCH 16/18] ARM: kirkwood: " Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-10 14:22 ` [PATCH 17/18] ARM: davinci: " Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-10 14:22 ` [PATCH 18/18] ARM: imx: " Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-10 19:12 ` [PATCH 00/18] cpuidle: code consolidation Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-04-10 20:01 ` Daniel Lezcano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51657E61.9010701@gmail.com \
--to=robherring2@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).