linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org (Daniel Lezcano)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] ARM: cpuidle: remove useless declaration
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 16:31:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <517003CF.5090106@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130418141359.GT14496@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>

On 04/18/2013 04:13 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 02:23:23PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 04/03/2013 02:15 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>> The noop functions code is not necessary because the header file is
>>> included in files which are compiled when CONFIG_CPU_IDLE is on.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
>>
>> I have been involved in the development of this file. I know Rob is no
>> longer working on this neither monitoring the code.
>>
>> Russell are you ok with this patch ? Rafael needs your ack to take this
>> patch into its tree.
> 
> I don't know - the description doesn't make it clear.  Surely, what you
> checked was that this file is _not_ included in any file which is built
> when CONFIG_CPU_IDLE is disabled.  In other words, when CONFIG_CPU_IDLE
> is not defined, arm_cpuidle_simple_enter() is never referenced.
> 
> If that is the case, then it's just that the patch description is the
> opposite of what it should be for this patch - and then the patch and
> description match and I don't see any reason to say no to it.
> 
> Then comes the issue of who takes the patch.  It looks like Rafael
> would like me to.

Actually Rafael was willing to take the patch if you ack it.


-- 
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-18 14:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-03 12:15 [PATCH 1/9] ARM: cpuidle: remove useless declaration Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-03 12:15 ` [PATCH 2/9] ARM: shmobile: pm: fix init sections Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-03 12:15 ` [PATCH 3/9] ARM: shmobile: cpuidle: remove useless WFI function Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-03 12:15 ` [PATCH 4/9] ARM: tegra2: cpuidle: change driver initialization Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-03 12:15 ` [PATCH 5/9] ARM: tegra: cpuidle: remove useless initialization Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-03 12:15 ` [PATCH 6/9] ARM: davinci: cpuidle: fix wrong enter function Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-04  7:16   ` Sekhar Nori
2013-04-03 12:15 ` [PATCH 7/9] intel: cpuidle: remove stop/start critical timings Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-04 22:31   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-04-07 20:52     ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-08 17:40       ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-08 19:27         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-04-08 19:27           ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-19 22:02   ` Len Brown
2013-04-03 12:15 ` [PATCH 8/9] ARM: omap3: cpuidle: enable time keeping Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-03 17:47   ` Kevin Hilman
2013-04-03 20:49     ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-03 21:43       ` Kevin Hilman
2013-04-03 12:15 ` [PATCH 9/9] POWERPC: pseries: cpuidle: use time keeping flag Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-03 14:25   ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-04 11:01     ` Deepthi Dharwar
2013-04-03 12:23 ` [PATCH 1/9] ARM: cpuidle: remove useless declaration Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-08 20:50   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-04-08 20:53     ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-18 14:13   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-04-18 14:31     ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2013-04-18 15:42       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-04-18 15:47         ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-04 22:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-04-03 10:56 Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-03 11:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-04-03 11:04   ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-03-29 10:31 Daniel Lezcano
2013-03-29 11:40 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-29 11:53   ` Daniel Lezcano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=517003CF.5090106@linaro.org \
    --to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).