From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] clocksource: arm_arch_timer: unify sched_clock init
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 17:00:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51708918.1070501@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1366313410-16692-1-git-send-email-robherring2@gmail.com>
On 04/18/13 12:30, Rob Herring wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> index 122ff05..17ed8e4 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> @@ -266,6 +266,15 @@ static struct notifier_block arch_timer_cpu_nb __cpuinitdata = {
> .notifier_call = arch_timer_cpu_notify,
> };
>
> +static u64 sched_clock_mult __read_mostly;
> +
> +unsigned long long notrace arch_timer_sched_clock(void)
> +{
> + return arch_timer_read_counter() * sched_clock_mult;
> +}
> +unsigned long long sched_clock(void) \
> + __attribute__((weak, alias("arch_timer_sched_clock")));
I'm still lost, how does this prevent the timer in ARM's 32 bit
sched_clock code from getting setup in sched_clock_postinit()? That
print is still there right? Who owns sched_clock() in multi-target builds?
Why can't we play along with the sched_clock code that lives in arm?
Maybe we should resurrect those clocksource sched_clock patches again.
Or maybe we should add support for setup_sched_clock_64() in arm's sched
clock code.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-19 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-18 19:30 [PATCH 1/2] clocksource: arm_arch_timer: unify sched_clock init Rob Herring
2013-04-18 19:30 ` [PATCH 2/2] clocksource: arm_arch_timer: add boot and suspend sched_clock offset Rob Herring
2013-04-19 14:46 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-04-19 0:00 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2013-04-19 1:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] clocksource: arm_arch_timer: unify sched_clock init Rob Herring
2013-04-19 17:34 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-04-20 0:29 ` [PATCH 0/4] ARM 64 bit sched_clock take #2 Stephen Boyd
2013-04-20 0:29 ` [PATCH 1/4] ARM: sched_clock: Remove unused needs_suspend member Stephen Boyd
2013-04-20 0:29 ` [PATCH 2/4] ARM: sched_clock: Return suspended count earlier Stephen Boyd
2013-04-20 0:29 ` [PATCH 3/4] ARM: sched_clock: Add support for >32 bit sched_clock Stephen Boyd
2013-04-22 10:48 ` Will Deacon
2013-04-22 15:35 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-04-20 0:29 ` [PATCH 4/4] ARM: arch_timer: Move to setup_sched_clock_64() Stephen Boyd
2013-04-22 15:16 ` [PATCH 0/4] ARM 64 bit sched_clock take #2 Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-22 15:34 ` Mark Rutland
2013-04-22 15:36 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-04-22 15:51 ` Mark Rutland
2013-04-22 17:00 ` John Stultz
2013-04-22 20:46 ` Rob Herring
2013-04-23 16:34 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-05-01 0:54 ` [PATCH 5/4] sched: Make ARM's sched_clock generic for all architectures Stephen Boyd
2013-05-01 0:54 ` [PATCH 6/4] arm64: Move to generic sched_clock infrastructure Stephen Boyd
2013-05-01 9:11 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-05-01 14:44 ` Christopher Covington
2013-05-31 20:40 ` [PATCH 5/4] sched: Make ARM's sched_clock generic for all architectures John Stultz
2013-05-31 22:13 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-05-31 23:50 ` John Stultz
2013-04-19 14:45 ` [PATCH 1/2] clocksource: arm_arch_timer: unify sched_clock init Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51708918.1070501@codeaurora.org \
--to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).