From: lauraa@codeaurora.org (Laura Abbott)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: RFC: Unified DMA allocation algorithms
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 14:35:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51785024.40305@codeaurora.org> (raw)
Hi all,
I've been looking at a better way to do custom dma allocation algorithms
in a similar style to Ion heaps. Most drivers/clients have come up with
a series of semi-standard ways to get memory (CMA, memblock_reserve,
discontiguous pages etc.) . As these allocation schemes get more and
more complex, there needs to be a since place where all clients (Ion
based driver vs. DRM driver vs. ???) can independently take advantage
of any optimizations and call a single API for the backing allocations.
The dma_map_ops take care of almost everything needed for abstraction
but the question is where should new allocation algorithms be located?
Most of the work has been added to either arm/mm/dma-mapping.c or
dma-contiguous.c . My current thought:
1) split out the dma_map_ops currently in dma-mapping.c into separate
files (dma-mapping-common.c, dma-mapping-iommu.c)
2) Extend dma-contiguous.c to support memblock_reserve memory
3) Place additional algorithms in either arch/arm/mm or
drivers/base/dma-alloc/ as appropriate to the code. This is the part
where I'm most unsure about the direction.
I don't have anything written yet but I plan to draft some patches
assuming the proposed approach sounds reasonable and no one else has
started on something similar already.
Thoughts? Opinions?
Thanks,
Laura
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
next reply other threads:[~2013-04-24 21:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-24 21:35 Laura Abbott [this message]
2013-05-01 10:26 ` [Linaro-mm-sig] RFC: Unified DMA allocation algorithms Daniel Vetter
2013-05-01 15:24 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51785024.40305@codeaurora.org \
--to=lauraa@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).