linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: lauraa@codeaurora.org (Laura Abbott)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: RFC: Unified DMA allocation algorithms
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 14:35:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51785024.40305@codeaurora.org> (raw)

Hi all,

I've been looking at a better way to do custom dma allocation algorithms 
in a similar style to Ion heaps. Most drivers/clients have come up with 
a series of semi-standard ways to get memory (CMA, memblock_reserve, 
discontiguous pages etc.) . As these allocation schemes get more and 
more complex, there needs to be a since place where all clients (Ion 
based driver vs. DRM driver vs. ???)  can independently take advantage 
of any optimizations and call a single API for the backing allocations.

The dma_map_ops take care of almost everything needed for abstraction
but the question is where should new allocation algorithms be located?
Most of the work has been added to either arm/mm/dma-mapping.c or
dma-contiguous.c . My current thought:

1) split out the dma_map_ops currently in dma-mapping.c into separate 
files (dma-mapping-common.c, dma-mapping-iommu.c)
2) Extend dma-contiguous.c to support memblock_reserve memory
3) Place additional algorithms in either arch/arm/mm or 
drivers/base/dma-alloc/ as appropriate to the code. This is the part 
where I'm most unsure about the direction.

I don't have anything written yet but I plan to draft some patches 
assuming the proposed approach sounds reasonable and no one else has 
started on something similar already.

Thoughts? Opinions?

Thanks,
Laura

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

             reply	other threads:[~2013-04-24 21:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-24 21:35 Laura Abbott [this message]
2013-05-01 10:26 ` [Linaro-mm-sig] RFC: Unified DMA allocation algorithms Daniel Vetter
2013-05-01 15:24 ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51785024.40305@codeaurora.org \
    --to=lauraa@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).