From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: rnayak@ti.com (Rajendra Nayak) Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 12:31:22 +0530 Subject: [PATCH V4 1/6] clk: OMAP: introduce device tree binding to kernel clock data In-Reply-To: <20130424162847.8998.73264@quantum> References: <1365807278-554-1-git-send-email-nm@ti.com> <1365807278-554-2-git-send-email-nm@ti.com> <20130412233142.GE10155@atomide.com> <20130412233900.GA1599@kahuna> <20130413172210.GM10155@atomide.com> <20130414211917.GA3275@snafu> <20130424162847.8998.73264@quantum> Message-ID: <5178D4C2.7080400@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wednesday 24 April 2013 09:58 PM, Mike Turquette wrote: > Quoting Nishanth Menon (2013-04-14 14:19:17) >> Overall strategy introduced here is simple: a clock node described in >> device tree blob is used to identify the exact clock provided in the >> SoC specific data. This is then linked back using of_clk_add_provider >> to the device node to be accessible by of_clk_get. >> >> Based on discussion contributions from Roger Quadros, Grygorii Strashko >> and others. >> >> Cc: Kevin Hilman >> Cc: Mike Turquette >> Cc: Paul Walmsley >> [tony at atomide.com: co-developed] >> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren >> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon > > I can take this into clk-next after the merge window. Please refresh it > for -rc1 as we discussed on irc. > > As an aside, will Tero's series for migrating to drivers/clk/omap[1] and > Rajendra's patch for registering clocks late[2] be refreshed after the [2] is already in mainline. > merge window? It would be nice to combine these efforts. > > Thanks, > Mike > > [1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.omap/95948 > [2] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg231288.html > _______________________________________________ > devicetree-discuss mailing list > devicetree-discuss at lists.ozlabs.org > https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss >