From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: robherring2@gmail.com (Rob Herring) Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 15:39:00 -0500 Subject: Fwd: Tegra 30 System hangs because of commit "pinctrl: move subsystem mutex to pinctrl_dev struct" In-Reply-To: References: <517ED12B.8080502@wwwdotorg.org> <20130504133004.GC24282@game.jcrosoft.org> <20130505112819.GD24282@game.jcrosoft.org> <20130505202236.GF24282@game.jcrosoft.org> <20130506194122.GG24282@game.jcrosoft.org> <20130506195403.GJ18614@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <5192A0E4.2070202@gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 05/09/2013 12:51 PM, Fathi Boudra wrote: > On 9 May 2013 19:13, Olof Johansson wrote: >> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 6:25 AM, Grant Likely wrote: >>> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 9:12 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: >>>> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux >> Yes, a builder is quite useful. Several of us do our own builds as well. >> >> When it comes to boot coverage, I'm not sure how successful a central >> approach would be. It's something where I think Linaro could >> contribute a lot for their member platforms, but I haven't seen much >> engagement there yet. > > My previous post was lost. Sorry to repost.. > > We've got a jenkins instance doing daily builds on various trees and > boot testing on the few boards we've got in the lab: > https://ci.linaro.org/jenkins/view/kernel-ci/ > > But it hasn't attracted much interest so far... It's been here since a year. Perhaps because there is no useful information there that I can find. Where does it say what failed in the build? I see no artifacts or useful console output. It seems it was designed with Linaro's needs in mind and not kernel maintainers' needs. Rob > >> Beyond there, I'd say the expectation is that each maintainer should >> keep an eye on their own platforms. They _should_ try building and >> booting linux-next on their platforms, to catch regressions early. And >> definitely around now, I'd like to see people boot mainline on their >> platforms to make sure we haven't added any severe regressions in the >> 3.10 merge window, etc. Some people are really good at this, others >> less so. >> >> What's the old saying, you can lead a horse to water but you can't >> make him drink? You can build a boot test cluster but you can't make >> anyone pay attention to it. :( >> >> -Olof > > Cheers, > > Fathi > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel >