From: swarren@wwwdotorg.org (Stephen Warren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: GPIO sysfs : set a wake source
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 13:49:20 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51953840.9050106@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ip2ig1ez.fsf@free.fr>
On 05/16/2013 01:39 PM, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org> writes:
>
>> On 05/14/2013 03:29 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I was thinking on how to remove all "gpio_request()" from my board code
>>>> (arch/arm/mach-pxa/mioa701.c).
>>>>
>>>> I have a small difficulty with the functionality provided by gpiolib in
>>>> userspace. This is what I need :
>>>> - define a gpio as an input
>>>> - define this gpio to be an interrupt source
>>>> - define this interrupt to be a wake-up source
>>>
>>> This sounds like trying to remove board code by moving it to userspace
>>> and basically starting to implement stuff that belongs in the kernel
>>> in userspace just because someone says we should get rid of board
>>> files :-)
> No, really, even it's true that it comes from someone asking me, now I have
> though it a bit more through.
>
>>> Don't go down this path, let the kernel handle this kind of stuff.
> Oh really, where ?
>
> Let me show you why it can't be a module.
> In my case, I have a 2G modem connected to the soc :
> - the modem and 1 SoC UART are connected (TX, RX, CTS, ...)
> - the modem and SoC are connected through several gpios
> - one or two control to power up and reset the modem
> - one connected to the modem "ring" signal (the one I want a wakeup for).
>
> So I have no module to handle my modem :
> - UART is handled by pxa-uart
> - control/reset by gpiolib
> - ring ... by nobody
>
> So my point is that this ring *should* be handled by gpiolib, just as any casual
> input gpio. Moreover, the "wake-up" ability should be activable/deactivable on
> wish by userspace.
>
>>> Instead figure out how to make the subsystems we have and the
>>> device trees express what you want to do.
>
> As I said above, I don't think it's the way to go. I have *no* subsystem to
> address.
> Devicetree can't help in the toggle to "activate" or "deactivate" the wakeup
> upon this GPIO, can it ?
This sounds very similar to WiFi rfkill, although it's a MODEM not WiFi.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-16 19:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-09 12:59 GPIO sysfs : set a wake source Robert Jarzmik
2013-05-14 9:29 ` Linus Walleij
2013-05-14 16:08 ` Stephen Warren
2013-05-16 19:39 ` Robert Jarzmik
2013-05-16 19:49 ` Stephen Warren [this message]
2013-05-17 3:18 ` Robert Jarzmik
2013-05-17 6:24 ` Linus Walleij
2013-05-18 9:18 ` Robert Jarzmik
2013-05-20 18:25 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51953840.9050106@wwwdotorg.org \
--to=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).